Teams

SDNC HT Carmel Valley/ Kuba

2023 Mixed Doubles Tri-Level Fall SDNC · SDNC (9.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-04vs SDNC HT San Dieguito TC/ BearWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Michael Yniguez vs Stepan Kartsub / Lori Kartsub6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-21vs SDNC LLW HT RBS&TC/ CarmichaelLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlena Khoroshansky / David Evans vs Ifunanya Aniefuna / Trung Vu2-6, 3-6
2023-10-14vs SDNC HT RSFTC/ TuminiLost 01
L#2 DoublesCasey Moore / Becky Kuba vs Mark Reedy / Mary Gaylord3-6, 4-6
2023-09-30vs SDNC HT San Dieguito TC/ BearWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Michael Yniguez vs Teresa Bear / Stepan Kartsub5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-16vs SDNC LLW HT RBS&TC/ CarmichaelLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanene Christopher / Jeff Fleming vs Rene Carmichael / Steven Hoang7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-09-09vs SDNC HT RSFTC/ TuminiWon 20
W#2 DoublesJanene Christopher / Jeff Fleming vs Sally Schimmel / Moffitt Timlake6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlena Khoroshansky / Bradley Blose vs Katherine Nakamura / Patrick Dougherty7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC (9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Sophia Richardson
published
3.81
Terri Bourne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Alena Khoroshansky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Becky Kuba
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Janene Christopher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Lisa Shirley
published
3.28
Bradley Blose
published 3.5
3.25
Brian Zimmerman
published 3.5
Stepanka Hastings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Richardson + Bradley Blose4643% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophia Richardson
27W–31L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Terri Bourne
105W–136L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Alena Khoroshansky
99W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Becky Kuba
178W–141L career · 1 line in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Janene Christopher
97W–105L career · 2 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Lisa Shirley
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Bradley Blose
5W–10L career · type M · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Brian Zimmerman
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Stepanka Hastings
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.