Teams

Humerick - River Creek Club

2024 Loudoun Combo · Loudoun Combo 5.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.79 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-30vs Belardo - Mood SwingsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura McNicholl / Karen Triplett vs Alicia Burns / Alexandra Robinson3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Shepley / Stephanie Holguin vs Carey Mottet / Maryam Aranee5-7, 5-6
2024-10-23vs LGCC McListerWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Shepley / Stephanie Holguin vs Whitney Harrison / Carly Schrager6-1, 6-3
2024-10-21vs HowardMcAtee - StoneleighLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalia Simek / Laura McNicholl vs Jessica Saleck / Maureen Fulkerson4-6, 1-6
2024-10-17vs Belardo - Mood SwingsWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Shepley / Stephanie Holguin vs Jennifer Leibold / Maryam Aranee4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-10-14vs Belardo - Mood SwingsLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhyllis Corley / Sandra Moses vs Maryam Aranee / Peggah Wilson5-7, 2-6
2024-10-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPhyllis Corley / Karen Triplett vs Deborah Johnson / Jill Vaughan7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-07vs HowardMcAtee - StoneleighWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristie FitzGerald / Phyllis Corley vs Tamra Howard-McAtee / Cameron Comienski7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Tosha Clark
published
2.96
Phyllis Corley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Nancy Shepley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Karen Keller
published
2.69
Laura McNicholl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Madison Humerick
published
2.56
2.55
Sandra Moses
published
2.51
Natalia Simek
published
2.39
Brittany Wiles
published 2.5
2.29
Karen Triplett
published
2.21
Amanda Klukowski
published 2.5
2.18
1.94
Christie FitzGerald
published 2.5
Stephanie Holguin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tosha Clark
54W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Phyllis Corley
141W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Nancy Shepley
82W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Karen Keller
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Laura McNicholl
92W–115L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
2.69
Madison Humerick
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
2.67
3
Celeste Linthicum
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
Sandra Moses
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Natalia Simek
24W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%47%53%
2.51
2.5
Brittany Wiles
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%80%20%
2.39
Karen Triplett
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Amanda Klukowski
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.21
Jennifer Volk-Fortier
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Christie FitzGerald
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Stephanie Holguin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.