Teams

LOS GATOS SR 55MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-01vs VILLAGES GCC 55MX7.0ALost 02
L#2 DoublesMargaret Ryan / Jim Mccanny vs Paul Spisar / Cheryl Butts-Diltz3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNeil Jarvis / Joanne Swing vs Steve Olson / Peggy Seidel6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-13vs VILLAGES GCC 55MX7.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Oda / Rebecca Wade vs Brett Anthony Foreman / Lolivic Shaw0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEric Hunsaker / Marci Hunsaker vs Paul Spisar / Karen Hillis4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNeil Jarvis / Joanne Swing vs Peggy Seidel / Harpreet Soin7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kristin Dillehay
published
3.87
Yuri Oda
published
3.86
Neil Jarvis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Garret Seevers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Sandra Black
published
3.40
Raymond Molina
published
3.34
Lisa Baumert
published
3.25
Rebecca Wade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Kathleen Watson
published
3.17
Amy Beth Hansman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Jim Mccanny
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Johnny Sendejo
published
3.15
Thomas Oda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Elizabeth Stukan
published
2.92
Russ Lujan
published
2.64
Darin Dillehay
published 3
Eric Hunsaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gerhard Macek
published
Joanne Swing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marci Hunsaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Dillehay
27W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Yuri Oda
9W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Neil Jarvis
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Garret Seevers
24W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Sandra Black
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Raymond Molina
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Lisa Baumert
34W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Rebecca Wade
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Kathleen Watson
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Amy Beth Hansman
13W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jim Mccanny
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Johnny Sendejo
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Thomas Oda
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Elizabeth Stukan
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Russ Lujan
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Darin Dillehay
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Eric Hunsaker
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gerhard Macek
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joanne Swing
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marci Hunsaker
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.