Teams

Adams-ICC

2026 Combo 40 & Over-DLT · Women 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Indianola Country Club
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Indianola Country Club
2026-08-20vs P. Miller-GGCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Adams / Cassey Hardin vs Liz Vickers / Rebecca Potter6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVickie L Dodd / Brenda Lott vs Rene Morlino / Mary Hairston6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPaula Simmons / Kay Pitts vs McCall Ainsworth / Lisa Weathers4-6, 4-6
2026-08-03vs Aylward-CCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Adams / Cassey Hardin vs Sarah Aylward / Michie Cotton3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVickie L Dodd / Brenda Lott vs Chloe Darden / Amy Denton Maggio6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobin Toler / Margaret Jones vs Jennifer LaMastus / Natalie Barrett6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Adams-ICC1030228
2P. Miller-GGCC1021216
3Wooley- DCTRC000000
4Blakely-Roberts- Winona000000
5Aylward-CCC02151164

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Robin Toler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Kay Pitts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Brenda Lott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Cassey Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Vickie L Dodd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Corri Zepponi
published 3
2.62
Paula Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Leigh Street
published
2.55
Katie Boykin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Lott + Paula Simmons5351% games−7.6% vs expected
Brenda Lott + Vickie L Dodd303 matchesnot enough data
Cassey Hardin + Vickie L Dodd303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robin Toler
25W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Kay Pitts
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Brenda Lott
20W–14L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.02
3
Cassey Hardin
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Vickie L Dodd
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.75
3
Corri Zepponi
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Simmons
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Leigh Street
14W–20L career · no lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
Katie Boykin
11W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.