Teams

T.Morrow

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-10vs B.BrooksWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Klemenz / David Anderson vs Chris Mann / William Durland6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDouglas Pletcher vs Randy Harrison6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTom Morrow / Bryan Simpson vs Bob Brooks / Walid Mustafa6-4, 6-4
2023-05-03vs C.Lav 4.0 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesTom Morrow / Bryan Simpson vs Adam Thompson / Michael Shaw6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDouglas Pletcher / Samuel Connor vs Emanuele Michi / John Myers6-2, 6-2
2023-04-26vs J.BRUCKELLost 12
W#1 DoublesTom Morrow / Bryan Simpson vs Richard Rambo / Alan Crews6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJames Klemenz / Matt Migliore vs Daniel Breazeale / Michael Marchi7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDouglas Pletcher / Josh Krasner vs John Bruckel / Sam Osman3-6, 4-6
2023-04-19vs A.OLIVER 4.0 40Won 10
W#2 DoublesTom Morrow / Bryan Simpson vs Pedro Loaiza / Samir Naik6-3, 6-3
2023-04-12vs L.NguyenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTom Morrow / Bryan Simpson vs Scott Schwartz / Takayuki Yamato6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Anderson / James Klemenz vs Jeff Plemmons / John VanDeWater4-6, 4-6
2023-03-22vs S.Wingo 4.0 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesJames Klemenz / Douglas Pletcher vs Barrett Rankin / Wes Snead6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTom Morrow / Bryan Simpson vs Michael Carlson / Pete Padilla6-1, 6-4
2023-03-15vs B.BrooksWon 21
W#1 DoublesTom Morrow / Bryan Simpson vs Gregory Kash / Christopher Turner7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Klemenz / Paul Wiegand vs Thomas Bell / William Durland3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDouglas Pletcher / Samuel Connor vs Bob Brooks / Bill Francis7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Tom Morrow
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.82
Douglas Pletcher
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.80
James Klemenz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Branden Ritchey
published 4
3.69
Bryan Simpson
published 4
3.68
Paul Wiegand
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Morrow + Bryan Simpson12458% games+0.4% vs expected
James Klemenz + Douglas Pletcher18562% games+0.1% vs expected
James Klemenz + Tom Morrow4256% gamesnot enough data
Tom Morrow + Douglas Pletcher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tom Morrow
276W–126L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Douglas Pletcher
178W–107L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
James Klemenz
188W–132L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Branden Ritchey
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Bryan Simpson
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Enric Prat Codina
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Paul Wiegand
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.