Teams

Campbell Wynlakes 2026

2026 Spring USTA 18 & Over Night League - Montgomery · 3.0 Men Night

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-31vs MCC ReyesLost 23
W#1 DoublesRichard Campbell Iii / Griffin Littlefield vs Franklin Johnson / Wes Hutto6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesWilliam Beatrous vs Viktor Perovic6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHammond Miller / Warner Mathis vs Charlie Elliott / William Britton6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHeywood Miller vs Rodrigo Barragan0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTravis Crane / Richard Cobb vs Matthew Harris / Joshua Stemle3-6, 4-6
2026-03-24vs Lagoon RobinsonLost 14
W#1 DoublesGriffin Littlefield / William Beatrous vs Thomas Rizzo / Alexander Shipp0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWarner Mathis vs Levani Odikadze3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHammond Miller / Richard Campbell Iii vs Habib Rehman / Murray Fail3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHeywood Miller vs Shreesh Shrestha2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Edwards / Richard Cobb vs Brian Jacobson / John Cannady1-6, 1-6
2026-03-10vs MCC ReyesLost 03
L#1 DoublesGriffin Littlefield / Richard Campbell Iii vs Rodrigo Barragan / Richard Vann6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Beatrous / Travis Crane vs Cason Willett / Daniel Rhyne1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Cobb / Hammond Miller vs Joshua Stemle / Mark Chappell3-6, 0-6
2026-03-03vs Lagoon RobinsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLee Joseph Casals / Richard Campbell Iii vs Habib Rehman / David Walker2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWarner Mathis / Richard Cobb vs Murray Fail / Brian Jacobson3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTravis Crane / William Beatrous vs Shreesh Shrestha / Alexander Shipp6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-17vs MCC ReyesLost 13
W#1 DoublesLee Joseph Casals / Hammond Miller vs Daniel Rhyne / Wes Hutto0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWilliam Beatrous vs Viktor Perovic6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTravis Crane / Heywood Miller vs Cason Willett / Matthew Harris2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Cobb / Warner Mathis vs Ben Starkie / Franklin Johnson4-6, 4-6
2026-02-10vs Lagoon RobinsonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGriffin Littlefield / Richard Campbell Iii vs Jelani Moore / David Walker1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWilliam Beatrous vs Thomas Rizzo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHammond Miller / Richard Cobb vs Lindsey McDonald / Habib Rehman2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHeywood Miller / Warner Mathis vs Brian Jacobson / Shreesh Shrestha5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-01-20vs Lagoon RobinsonLost 13
W#1 DoublesGriffin Littlefield / Hammond Miller vs Alexander Shipp / Jelani Moore2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWilliam Beatrous vs Jonathan Tuckwell3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Edwards / Richard Cobb vs Murray Fail / Brian Jacobson4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesWarner Mathis vs Habib Rehman6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0 Men Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Campbell Wynlakes 20260792659384

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Griffin Littlefield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Lee Joseph Casals
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Warner Mathis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
William Beatrous
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.70
Hammond Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Richard Campbell Iii
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.53
Richard Cobb
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.50
Brian Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.46
Travis Crane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.41
Heywood Miller
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Campbell Iii + Griffin Littlefield3351% gamesnot enough data
Lee Joseph Casals + Hammond Miller213 matchesnot enough data
Brian Edwards + Richard Cobb033 matchesnot enough data
Richard Campbell Iii + Hammond Miller033 matchesnot enough data
Hammond Miller + Richard Cobb033 matchesnot enough data
Heywood Miller + Travis Crane033 matchesnot enough data
Heywood Miller + Richard Cobb033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Griffin Littlefield
5W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
2.96
Lee Joseph Casals
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Warner Mathis
3W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
William Beatrous
4W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Hammond Miller
4W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Richard Campbell Iii
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Richard Cobb
0W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Brian Edwards
0W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Travis Crane
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46
Heywood Miller
1W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.