Teams

MRC:Advantage:Rosa

2021 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 W - 3

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-05-07vs TC:The Ova's:TsichlasLost 13
L#1 DoublesTrish Rosa / Susan Ratcliffe vs Shawna Baron / Janet Baron1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMina Kim vs Kyle Dawson2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMiyako Kinoshita / Janet Zupkus vs Ethel Tsichlas / Lynn Allen6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDana Manning / Dawn Gargano vs Dale Norton / Carol Finnucan2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-02vs TRC:Smash Girls:ZwartWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanine Capanna / Susan Ratcliffe vs Nicole Rivera / Gillian Sizer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Avari / Kathryn Hanson vs Priscilla Twombly / Margaret Mehai6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMina Kim / Silvia Islam vs Susan Dellenbaugh / Elizabeth Zarrilli6-2, 6-1
2021-04-18vs 4S:Good Vibes:Williams/HealyLost 13
L#1 DoublesMiyako Kinoshita / Silvia Islam vs Sarah OMalley / Jennifer Amadeo6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJanet Zupkus vs Emily Keating3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTrish Rosa / Janine Capanna vs Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen / Kerry Williams3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMina Kim / Susan Ratcliffe vs Kristin Healy / Terri Weston6-2, 6-3
2021-04-17vs TRC:Smash Girls:ZwartWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrish Rosa / Diane Sullivan vs Gillian Sizer / Priscilla Twombly1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Ratcliffe / Mina Kim vs Margaret Mehai / Mary Matera6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTricia Ruddy / Dawn Briggs vs Debbie Kemp-Weiss / Nicole Rivera0-6, 6-7
2021-03-28vs 4S:Good Vibes:Williams/HealyLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Ratcliffe / Janine Capanna vs Jennifer Amadeo / Catherine East6-4, 6-6
L#2 DoublesSilvia Islam / Miyako Kinoshita vs Laura Hussey / Stephanie Mercado6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDana Manning / Karen Montini vs Valerie D'Alexander / Sarah OMalley3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesTrish Rosa / Miyako Kinoshita vs Kathleen Finlay / Flavia Lodato2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMina Kim vs Jennifer Weitz4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Avari / Kathryn Hanson vs Patricia Rinaldi / Darcy Haskins6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDana Manning / Janet Zupkus vs Susan Gregor / Jane Donnarumma3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJanine Capanna / Jennifer Avari vs Susan Haven / Jacquelyn Hutchison1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTrish Rosa / Miyako Kinoshita vs Kira Lent / Lynn Atkins1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMina Kim / Janet Zupkus vs Laura King / Erin Polatsek7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2020-11-07vs TC:The Ova's:TsichlasWon 31
W#1 DoublesTrish Rosa / Miyako Kinoshita vs Ethel Tsichlas / Kyle Dawson6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSusan Ratcliffe vs Tina Rivera1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMina Kim / Jennifer Avari vs Lana Wall / Nelida Reyes-Matos6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDana Manning / Janet Zupkus vs Dale Norton / Barbara Block6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDiane Sullivan / Janine Capanna vs Cathy Dann / Kathleen Finlay6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMina Kim vs Jennifer Lawton6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMiyako Kinoshita / Silvia Islam vs Pamela Drummond / Patricia Rinaldi6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDana Manning / Karen Montini vs Pam Goehringer / Diana Cunningham7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKathryn Hanson / Jennifer Avari vs Terry Nolan / Susan Haven4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJanet Zupkus vs Amanda Cotter6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTrish Rosa / Susan Ratcliffe vs Julie Bastarache / Lynn Atkins5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTricia Ruddy / Dawn Briggs vs Maggie Nava / Janice Lareau5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 3.5 W - 3
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KH:Serves You Right:Smith/Woodruff01033719244
2OGT:No Unforced Heiress:Rothe010281230285
34S:Good Vibes:Williams/Healy010261435328
4CP:40 Lovers:das Neves010231736342
5KH:Glam Slams 40+:Harned010241637318
6MIT:You've Been Served:Hutchison/Haven010241638377
7CP:Chelsea Hurricane:Raman/Losada010211943354
8NC:3.5 40+ Wise Aces W/E:Hill/Gardiner010202046364
94S:2021 40+ Wilton Tiebreakers:Gregor/Haskins010202046343
10WRC:The Unpoachables:Moseley/Ulfsson010182250367
11MRC:Advantage:Rosa010172350384
12KH:Spin Returns II:Pearson010152554400
13WRC:The Nanetters:Reilly/Moody010103063416
14FIT:Refuse To Lose:Even/Lieberson01073366455

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Janine Capanna
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.46
Jennifer Avari
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.26
Kathryn Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Coleen Motta
published 3.5
3.21
Miyako Kinoshita
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.20
Tricia Ruddy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Trish Rosa
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.09
Dana Manning
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Silvia Islam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Dawn Briggs
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Dawn Gargano
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Janet Zupkus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Karen Montini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mina Kim
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Susan Ratcliffe
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Ratcliffe + Jennifer Avari5167% games+15.4% vs expected
Silvia Islam + Mina Kim3252% games+9.9% vs expected
Janine Capanna + Jennifer Avari13657% games+4.7% vs expected
Trish Rosa + Jennifer Avari24857% games+3.3% vs expected
Trish Rosa + Susan Ratcliffe231554% games+2.4% vs expected
Kathryn Hanson + Jennifer Avari281058% games+0.6% vs expected
Janet Zupkus + Dana Manning161054% games+0.4% vs expected
Susan Ratcliffe + Mina Kim5748% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janine Capanna
106W–96L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Jennifer Avari
131W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.46
Kathryn Hanson
66W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Coleen Motta
5W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Miyako Kinoshita
104W–82L career · 7 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
Tricia Ruddy
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Trish Rosa
142W–120L career · 7 lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Dana Manning
37W–44L career · 5 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
Silvia Islam
113W–111L career · 4 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Dawn Briggs
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Dawn Gargano
11W–21L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Janet Zupkus
44W–34L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Montini
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mina Kim
60W–53L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Ratcliffe
78W–63L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.