Teams

Beretennisholics

2025 Mixed 55 and Over League · 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.95 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-28vs Team 96797Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Chang / Douglas Smith vs Lyn Joson / Daniel Medina4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLisa Barnes / David Andrew vs Cora Toledo / Kenneth Eguchi6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMolly Lammers / Ryker Lammers vs Toby Arakaki / Roy Morigawara2-6, 5-7
2025-09-21vs Unforced ErrorsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Barnes / Bruce Nagel vs Ken Niimura / Tomoko Balbirona6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMolly Lammers / Bill Ota vs Curtis Kam / Carol Mau6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDouglas Smith / Laurie Tyau vs Minza Shiraki-Higa / Scott Higashino6-3, 6-1
2025-09-14vs Team LabubuLost 03
L#1 DoublesLawrence Lowe / Starr Quon vs Dexter Osato / Holly Toguchi6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBruce Nagel / Lori Chang vs Kirk Horiuchi / Marie Imanaka5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDouglas Smith / Laurie Tyau vs Peggy Watanabe / Jerry Siu4-6, 1-6
2025-09-07vs Hawaii/Davis/55&O/8.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Andrew / Lisa Barnes vs Yun Kim / Andrea Weathers3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLori Chang / Tod Tanaka vs Albert Murata / Sonya Trapp2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRyker Lammers / Lisa Cipres vs Victor Mau / Tamami Tomida3-6, 4-6
2025-08-31vs OC MimosasLost 12
W#1 DoublesTod Tanaka / Laurie Tyau vs Joyce Kwok / Darren Dong6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Chang / Douglas Smith vs Kurtis Derell / Mieko Takada2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMolly Lammers / Wayne Goo vs John Irons / Miyuki Haught4-6, 3-6
2025-08-17vs Racquet MastersLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Chang / Tod Tanaka vs Jodie Nagasako / Carlo Balmilero4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBill Ota / Lisa Cipres vs Russell Kobayashi / Anna Hinkley4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMolly Lammers / Wayne Goo vs Andrea Yamato / Frederick Shaw2-6, 2-6
2025-08-10vs Cellar Dwellars 55 8.0 MixLost 03
L#1 DoublesWayne Goo / Lisa Cipres vs Lionel Barona / Noriko Tamamoto5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLisa Barnes / David Andrew vs Taku Miyazawa / Hiromi Saito5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRyker Lammers / Molly Lammers vs Kyle Wright / Chintana Griffin2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hawaii/Davis/55&O/8.0X7018311133
2Team 96797611748137
3Racquet Masters34101123199
4Cellar Dwellars 55 8.0 Mix34101125202
5Unforced Errors3491226193
6OC Mimosas3491227206
7Team Labubu2571431216
8Beretennisholics1641735232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Lisa Cipres
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Molly Lammers
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
David Andrew
published 4
Douglas Smith
published 4
3.73
Laurie Tyau
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Bruce Nagel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Lori Chang
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.68
Tod Tanaka
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Lisa Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Wayne Goo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.35
Starr Quon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Bill Ota
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janice Bodinus
published
Lawrence Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryker Lammers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryker Lammers + Molly Lammers0534% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lisa Cipres
88W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Molly Lammers
81W–82L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.09
4
Clare Brady Edelen
3W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Andrew
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Douglas Smith
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Laurie Tyau
64W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Bruce Nagel
29W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Lori Chang
61W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Tod Tanaka
23W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Lisa Barnes
59W–97L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Wayne Goo
40W–51L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Starr Quon
59W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Bill Ota
56W–91L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
Janice Bodinus
22W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lawrence Lowe
18W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ryker Lammers
3W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.