Teams

Payne Park Love All

2023 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Wednesday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-01vs Sarasota National BrosnanWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacey Allerton / Paula Brown vs Rene Brosnan / Suzanne Brosnan7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Arndt / Laura Krotky vs Trish Connolly / Ethel Gilkey6-4, 6-4
2023-02-15vs River Strand KerstenLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Evans / Karen Ingrando vs Jenny Sherr / Sheryl Eckert3-6, 2-6
2023-02-01vs LBK Club SamuelsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacey Allerton / Paula Brown vs Nancy McLean / Paula Steptoe2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCecile Wooster / Karen Ingrando vs Teresa Samuels / Tina Swartz1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-01-25vs LWR SteffensWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Krotky / Lynne Powell vs Patricia Cunningham / Janice Rafalowski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-18vs Cedars HowardWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaura Krotky / Cecile Wooster vs Nancy Smith / Betsy Winder6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJo Anne Cullen / Karen Ingrando vs Kimberly Howard / Christina DeCarlo6-3, 6-4
2023-01-11vs Stoneybrook YoungWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaula Brown / Beth Arndt vs Karin Dayton / Andrea Anderson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Roberta Smith
published
3.43
Lynne Powell
published
3.42
Cecile Wooster
published 3.5
3.36
Laura Krotky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Karen Ingrando
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Beth Arndt
published 3.5
3.06
Lisa Pauley
published
Jane Welihozkiy
published
Jo Anne Cullen
published
Linda Evans
published
Paula Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Welihozkiy + Karen Ingrando7259% gamesnot enough data
Linda Evans + Jo Anne Cullen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roberta Smith
13W–23L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Lynne Powell
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Cecile Wooster
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Laura Krotky
26W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
Karen Ingrando
21W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Beth Arndt
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Lisa Pauley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
Jane Welihozkiy
49W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jo Anne Cullen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Evans
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Brown
24W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.