Teams

OAK MCANALLY

2024 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-19vs RTC FRIZZELL/COOPERWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Woods / Mary Wright vs Nancy Conner / Gina Tallent6-3, 6-4
2024-03-29vs CCC VIETTIWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatrina Gunn / Mary Wright vs Sherri Ross / Janet Kasper6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-08vs STC ZAVASKYLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Wright / Lisa Ingram vs Melissa Jolly / Shannon Forbus0-6, 4-6
2024-03-01vs RC RUCKER/BOURGEOISLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Wright / Katrina Gunn vs Lindsi Bourgeois / Jenna Loeffelholz2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jan Cason
published 3.5
3.25
Holly Wood
published 3.5
3.16
Susan Young
published
3.07
Lisa Ingram
published
3.07
Laurie Taggart
published
3.04
Andrea Grubbs
published 3.5
3.02
Lydia Bouck
published
3.02
Sandra Rhoads
published
2.95
Kristin Stork
published
2.90
Michelle Woods
published
2.90
Lorelei Bautista
published
2.88
Kathleen Cason
published
2.88
Kimberly McAnally
published
Mary Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Kate Stork
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Stork + Kristin Stork314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jan Cason
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Holly Wood
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Susan Young
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.16
Lisa Ingram
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
Laurie Taggart
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Andrea Grubbs
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Lydia Bouck
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Sandra Rhoads
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
3.02
Kristin Stork
26W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Michelle Woods
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Lorelei Bautista
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
Kathleen Cason
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
Kimberly McAnally
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Mary Wright
6W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kate Stork
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.