Teams

6 Stephens Surge at Belmont

2023 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-10vs 3 Dominion Bales OriolesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJonathan Brew / Todd Furbee vs Nelson Dawson / Scott Mainwaring6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDonald Love / Lyman Brown vs Joe Basil / Jeff Duffy4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-13vs 4 Salisbury RiegelWon 30
W#1 DoublesHenry Wood / Lyman Brown vs Dean Deaver / Dan Riegel6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRobert Steele / Todd Furbee vs Michael Miller / William Barnes6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWilliam Stephens / Sung Kang vs John Liscio / Whitley Day6-1, 6-1
2023-07-06vs 2 Belmont Big NastyLost 01
L#3 DoublesSung Kang / Bill Carico vs Jerry Cole / Patrick Survello0-6, 4-6
2023-06-29vs 9 Wyndham HouffWon 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Brew / Todd Furbee vs Brad Houff / Carey Donovan6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-15vs 5 MRTC ThorntonWon 20
W#1 DoublesSung Kang / Chris Pecci vs Darren Jones / James Dugger6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTodd Furbee / Henry Wood vs Earl Meekins / Jay Munya4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Sung Kang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Scott Kim
published
3.93
Todd Furbee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Henry Wood
published
3.74
Ken Patterson
published
3.70
Donald Love
published
3.64
Jay Abbud
published
3.61
Michael Hazelwood
published
3.56
Jonathan Brew
published
3.55
Chris Pecci
published 4
3.50
Lyman Brown
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Bill Carico
published 3.5
3.31
Jeff Richman
published
Greg Deeb
published
Jeffrey Pope
published
Paul Calamita
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Patterson + Henry Wood134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sung Kang
202W–85L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.19
Scott Kim
4W–19L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Todd Furbee
72W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
Henry Wood
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
Ken Patterson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Donald Love
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Jay Abbud
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jonathan Brew
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Chris Pecci
7W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Lyman Brown
182W–202L career · 5 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Bill Carico
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.45
Jeff Richman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.31
Greg Deeb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffrey Pope
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Calamita
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.