Teams

Fr.Harris40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-11vs Ki.Manning40ALost 02
L#2 DoublesMindy Hamlin / Molly Chaffee vs Rossana Prevost / Kim Manning3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJill Wolborsky / Judy Auld vs Stephanie Fogarty / Shannon Aumer2-6, 0-6
2024-05-04vs La.McRee40ALost 01
L#3 DoublesHeather Russell / Jill Wolborsky vs Lanier McRee / Valerie Clowes1-6, 0-6
2024-04-27vs La.Yopp40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Nels / Stephanie Ratliff vs Sara Fitzpatrick / Lauren Johns2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-20vs Ja.Bossert40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMindy Hamlin / Jill Wolborsky vs Jennifer Cotner / Corinna Proctor1-6, 1-6
2024-04-13vs Ca.Langlois40ASplit 11
W#2 DoublesStephanie Ratliff / Kelly Nels vs Catherine Langlois / Michele Gan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudy Auld / Molly Chaffee vs Teri Wallace / Elizabeth Pavese3-6, 3-6
2024-04-06vs Ki.Manning40AWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Ratliff / Jill Wolborsky vs Liz Bottoms / Heath Hilliker4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-17vs La.Yopp40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesMindy Hamlin / Jill Wolborsky vs Sara Fitzpatrick / Laurie Yopp5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFran Harris / Kelly Nels vs Alice Touchette / Cameron Jones4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Martinelli / Molly Chaffee vs Monika Garrell / Lauren Johns3-6, 3-6
2024-03-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesJill Wolborsky / Carrie Martinelli vs Melissa Pereira / Christine Harris6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Josette Huntress
published 3
2.77
Kelly Nels
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Cathy Marion
published 3
2.74
Amanda Shelton
published 3
2.67
Molly Chaffee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Jill Wolborsky
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Mindy Hamlin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Chaffee + Kelly Nels213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Josette Huntress
38W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
2.5
Kelly Nels
69W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%2%98%
2.77
3
Carrie Martinelli
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Cathy Marion
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Amanda Shelton
9W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.74
2.5
Molly Chaffee
68W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%10%90%
2.67
2.5
Jill Wolborsky
41W–101L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
Mindy Hamlin
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.