Teams

EButler/FRead (Queens)

2022 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-07vs MEccleston (Lifetime)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Winterich / Michelle Lynch vs Melissa Eccleston / Kristy Simmons6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-02vs SGerry (Providence Country Club)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Winterich / Jennifer Engel vs Luann Scruggs / Laura Richards7-6, 6-1
2022-08-19vs KNeigoot (Myers Park)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Winterich / Jennifer Engel vs Tricia Smith / Tamara Robb6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Elisa Salim
published 4
3.48
Michelle Lynch
published
3.47
Michelle Winterich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Melanie Freeman
published
3.20
Mildred Deely
published 3.5
2.98
Edie Butler Rowe
published 3.5
2.81
Mary Kirby
published
2.40
Freida Haselden
published 3
Amelym Nasr
published
Marsha Wall
published
Pamela Huggins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elisa Salim
71W–28L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
Michelle Lynch
31W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Michelle Winterich
90W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
Melanie Freeman
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Mildred Deely
79W–102L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Edie Butler Rowe
10W–20L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Mary Kirby
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Freida Haselden
3W–17L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.40
Amelym Nasr
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marsha Wall
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Huggins
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.