Teams

Huntington, Meg

2025 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-06vs Mitchell, ReJohnnaWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeslie Owens / Rachel Harris vs ReJohnna Mitchell / Rhonda Williams0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Galey / Jennifer Otto vs Vonda Reeves / Felisha Sheppard6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Mashburn / Laura Blair vs Deborah McGehee / Charmel Chatmon6-1, 7-6
2025-09-29vs Jackson, SusanWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaura Blair / Jennifer Otto vs Anna Dotson / Jennifer Evans7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLauren Ingram / Lauren Mashburn vs Julie Thompson / Nan Dear6-1, 6-0
2025-09-22vs Sing, StephanieWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Kate Diltz / Jessie Humble vs Jessica Langley / Lisa Little3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Galey / Mary Beth Cantrell vs Beverly Turner / Christina Siddens1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Owens / Rachel Harris vs Kimberley Yates / Melanie McLeod6-2, 6-3
2025-09-15vs Do, JenniferWon 20
W#2 DoublesLauren Ingram / Chiali Register vs Leisa McCool / Meredith Boston7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Kate Diltz / Jessie Humble vs Ashley Stroud / Elizabeth MacPherson6-1, 6-4
2025-09-08vs Alexander, TerraWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Ingram / Mary Beth Cantrell vs Carla Rushing / Misty Stricklin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Blair / Jennifer Otto vs Tara Baugh / Jamie McNamara6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura McMahon / Rachel Harris vs Terra Alexander / Heidi Hill6-1, 6-0
2025-08-25vs Sessums, JoeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Mashburn / Amanda Galey vs Juli Johnson / Heather Bailey2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Harrell / Meg Huntington vs Joey Sessums / Mandalin Blanton2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChiali Register / Lauren Ingram vs Owen Mullen / Jenny Claire Hammond Dyre4-6, 2-6
2025-08-18vs Carmody, MacKenzieSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMeg Huntington / Jessie Humble vs Sumner Douglas / Emma Bond0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Ingram / Mary Beth Cantrell vs MacKenzie Carmody / Steele Lee6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sessums, Joey7018311145
2Huntington, Meg6115616156
3Carmody, MacKenzie5213819159
4Jackson, Susan34101127209
5Mitchell, ReJohnna1671432229
6Sing, Stephanie1651633220
7Alexander, Terra1641735230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Chiali Register
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Jessie Humble
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Jennifer Otto
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.23
Mary Beth Cantrell
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Lauren Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.02
Amanda Galey
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Lauren Mashburn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Mary Kate Diltz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.64
Leslie Owens
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Meg Huntington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Harris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Huntington + Lauren Ingram4161% games+0.2% vs expected
Jessie Humble + Jennifer Otto213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chiali Register
21W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Jessie Humble
37W–21L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.66
Jennifer Otto
35W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Mary Beth Cantrell
31W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Lauren Ingram
26W–10L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3.5
Amanda Galey
25W–27L career · 9 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Lauren Mashburn
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Mary Kate Diltz
29W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Leslie Owens
10W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Meg Huntington
18W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Harris
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.