Teams

Zaborski-Rosemary

2025 OWB Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Abbott / Erika Anderson vs Akiko Ichimasa / Lubomir Kaderjak2-6, 1-6
2025-05-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Abbott / Erika Anderson vs Keith Williams / Kati Hill3-6, 3-6
2025-04-06vs OWB/Bachman/40&Over8.0XLost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Abbott / Ashley Edmonds vs Brad Brown / Amy Brown7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Phillips / Natacha Phillips vs Brandon Bachman / Wendy Barbary1-6, 0-6
2025-04-06vs OWB/Bachman/40&Over8.0XSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRobert Abbott / Ashley Edmonds vs Hari Prasad / Tricia Hafdahl6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJames Phillips / Natacha Phillips vs Brandon Bachman / Wendy Barbary3-6, 2-6
2025-03-30vs Kaderjak-FWBTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Abbott / Natacha Phillips vs Lauren Haack / Ken McCurdy7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-16vs OWB/Bachman/40&Over8.0XLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Edmonds / Robert Abbott vs Michael Johns / Alicia Roberson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-16vs OWB/Bachman/40&Over8.0XWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Abbott / Natacha Phillips vs Tricia Hafdahl / Hari Prasad0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Alexis Ernst
published 4.5
3.78
Robert Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Carlye Zaborski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Natacha Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Meg Castleberry
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.51
Patricia Sherrod
published
3.47
Ashley Edmonds
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jason McLemore
published
Todd Zaborski
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexis Ernst
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
4.33
Robert Abbott
87W–56L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Carlye Zaborski
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Natacha Phillips
134W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Meg Castleberry
22W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Patricia Sherrod
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Ashley Edmonds
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jason McLemore
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Zaborski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.