Teams

Greenhill/Pearson-Bennett W4.5S (F2023 WC)

2023 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

18 players · average NTRP 4.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alisa Bennett
published 5
Andrea Dodd
published 5
4.47
Claudia Clancy
published 5
4.45
Sonia Moorthy
published
4.45
Allison Parks
published 5
4.40
Holly Kerr
published 4.5
4.35
Melissa Walters
published
4.31
Jennifer Latimer
published
4.27
Krista Carlson
published
Cecy Feld
published 4.5
4.22
Ana Castano-Mears
published 4.5
4.22
Anne Perez
published 4.5
4.21
Lynh Pham
published
4.18
Teri Ware
published
4.01
Lynne Wakeland
published
Margaux Dalbin
published
Sarah Braley
published
Tara Murphy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynh Pham + Krista Carlson4443% games−14.7% vs expected
Andrea Dodd + Teri Ware404 matchesnot enough data
Sonia Moorthy + Holly Kerr314 matchesnot enough data
Teri Ware + Jennifer Latimer314 matchesnot enough data
Sonia Moorthy + Anne Perez213 matchesnot enough data
Holly Kerr + Anne Perez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alisa Bennett
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Andrea Dodd
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Claudia Clancy
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
4.47
Sonia Moorthy
37W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
4.45
5
Allison Parks
23W–3L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
4.45
4.5
Holly Kerr
18W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
4.40
Melissa Walters
37W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
4.35
Jennifer Latimer
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
4.31
Krista Carlson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
4.27
4.5
Cecy Feld
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Ana Castano-Mears
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Anne Perez
32W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.22
Lynh Pham
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
4.21
Teri Ware
26W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
4.18
Lynne Wakeland
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
4.01
Margaux Dalbin
31W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Braley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tara Murphy
19W–25L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.