Teams

Ki.Durland18S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-01vs Mc.Osman18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesSamantha Cronin vs Martha Sanders0-6, 1-6
2024-11-01vs Mc.Osman18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesSamantha Cronin vs Julia Kerr6-3, 6-1
2024-10-28vs Mc.Osman18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Elizabeth Matthews0-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Mary Beth Broyles4-6, 1-6
2024-10-24Split 11
L#2 SinglesLawrie Givner vs Elizabeth Merritt5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesLori Bourne vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-24vs El.Merritt18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesLori Bourne vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLawrie Givner vs Tacey Hesmer0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-10-24Split 11
W#1 SinglesKimberly Durland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesLawrie Givner vs Elizabeth Merritt4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-10-21Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Elizabeth Matthews3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Amy Clarke5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-29Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSamantha Cronin vs Amy Perry1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Stephanie Ferrell
published
3.55
Emily Slater
published 3.5
3.54
Samantha Cronin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Lawrie Givner
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Kimberly Durland
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Lori Bourne
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Carole Anne Hussey
published 3.5
3.09
Kari Knoblauch
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Cronin + Lawrie Givner22564% games+10.8% vs expected
Kimberly Durland + Lawrie Givner3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Ferrell
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Emily Slater
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Samantha Cronin
72W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Lawrie Givner
50W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Kimberly Durland
208W–190L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Lori Bourne
77W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Carole Anne Hussey
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Kari Knoblauch
114W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.