Teams

VTC-McGirk

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Feeney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Todd Klindt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.15
David Sturdyvin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Colin Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.95
Todd Kuribayashi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Thomas McGirk
published 4.5
3.78
Jonathan Gonzales
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Jack Yothers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Results9 ties
2023-06-18Won 30
W#1 DoublesTodd Klindt / Thomas McGirk vs Brendan Cunningham / Mitchell Strauss6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTodd Kuribayashi / Mike Mon vs Kent Lewis / Steve Bolstad6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Kyne / Jack Yothers vs David Kabaker / Gregg Palmer6-4, 6-2
2023-06-17Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Feeney / Robert Kyne vs John Ezelle / Paul Ezelle6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTodd Klindt / Sherwood Newell vs Josh Schweitz / Arthur Kowitch7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesThomas McGirk / Colin Arnold vs Frank Collie / Ian Fudalla6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-10Won 20
W#1 DoublesSherwood Newell / David Sturdyvin vs Steve Fogg / Honorato Wenceslao7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTodd Klindt / Colin Arnold vs Adrian Polliack / Michael Laport6-2, 6-3
2023-06-04Split 11
W#1 DoublesSherwood Newell / Todd Klindt vs Dirk Koopman / Daniel Larsen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThomas McGirk / Colin Arnold vs Benjamin Yang / Andrew Nilsson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-05-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesJames Feeney / Todd Klindt vs Jeremy Morris / Corey Kincaid6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmahal Barbee / Colin Arnold vs Michael Malin / Bruce Sylva6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-27Won 31
W#1 DoublesJames Feeney / Todd Klindt vs Richard Shih / Deepak Selvanathan6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJack Yothers vs Eddy Rodriguez6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Heim / Todd Kuribayashi vs Austin Jou / Ken Blancher6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas McGirk / Colin Arnold vs Sheng Saechao / Sushil Srivastava6-2, 6-1
2023-05-21Won 30
W#1 DoublesJames Feeney / Bryan Endreson vs Xavier Denis / Craig Williams6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMike Mon / Jonathan Gonzales vs Matt Chesley / Agus Rusli7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas McGirk / Todd Klindt vs Dave Cobban / Gareth Hosford7-6, 7-5
2023-05-06Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Feeney / Robert Kyne vs Mark Simpson / Christopher Haddon6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMike Mon / Jonathan Gonzales vs Nathan Austin / Alex Young6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesThomas McGirk / Todd Kuribayashi vs Thomas Turnbull / Reza Kafi2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-23Split 11
W#1 DoublesJames Feeney / Bryan Endreson vs Renato Bernasconi Zuccari / Yascha Noonberg6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesColin Arnold / Robert Kyne vs Joerg Droste / Ken Nichols6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
James Feeney
75W–32L career
not enough data
4.5
Todd Klindt
50W–26L career
not enough data
4.5
David Sturdyvin
45W–34L career
1%99%0%
4.15
4.5
Colin Arnold
67W–70L career
17%83%0%
3.99
4
Todd Kuribayashi
38W–37L career
0%88%12%
3.95
4.5
Thomas McGirk
56W–73L career
25%75%0%
3.95
4
Jonathan Gonzales
18W–18L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4.5
Jack Yothers
43W–50L career
87%13%0%
3.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.