Teams

Ro.Sellick18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-27vs Ch.Lav18TSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDamien Graham / Thomas Taylor vs Davis Humphries / Jason Liner2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRob Sellick / David Roberts vs Chun Lav / Philip Gugliotta6-2, 7-6
2023-07-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesDamien Graham / Thomas Taylor vs Baaqir Yusuf / Samuel Riley6-1, 6-2
2023-06-29vs Sc.StJohn18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Taylor / Damien Graham vs Scott St John / Ryan Lindsay0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-22vs Jo.Markham18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesMicah Widen / Damien Graham vs Bryan Barker / Penn Holderness6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRob Sellick / David Roberts vs John Markham / William Amburn4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-08vs St.Fu18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesMitchell Myers / Micah Widen vs Brandon Keisner / Patrick Shields0-6, 0-6
2023-06-01vs Ga.Fye18TWon 20
W#1 DoublesDamien Graham / Mitchell Myers vs Stan Wingo / Patrick Wood6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLuo Xiao / Rob Sellick vs Robert Marriott / Kevin Manweiler6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-30vs Co.Sutler18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesMicah Widen / Mitchell Myers vs Scott Cruikshank / Larry Leins3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRob Sellick / Luo Xiao vs Robert Caulfield / Tyler Priest6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-25vs Bi.Green18TWon 20
W#1 DoublesThomas Taylor / Micah Widen vs Farr Curlin / Scott Hoffman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Beck / Luo Xiao vs Bill Green / David Kelly6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Damien Graham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Mitchell Myers
published
3.58
Kyle Faltisco
published
3.54
Micah Widen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Luo Xiao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Rob Sellick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Patrick Graney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rob Sellick + Luo Xiao1442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Damien Graham
28W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Mitchell Myers
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Kyle Faltisco
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Micah Widen
49W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Luo Xiao
85W–101L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Rob Sellick
57W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Patrick Graney
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.