Teams

PRC RED

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-26vs RRTC ORANGEWon 32
W#1 DoublesErika Pope / Jackie Smith vs Patricia Colella / Laura Peterson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Carter vs Christy Battaglia6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Harris / Sharon Kisch vs Lisa Hardin / Carrie Miller2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKelli Swan vs Kristin Mccarty6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCeleste Gardner / Janice Nelson vs Fernanda Solis / Sari Nicholson4-6, 6-7
2025-05-19vs DCHS YELLOWWon 32
L#1 DoublesJackie Smith / Amber Harris vs Christine Strang / Raney Kilgore4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesEmily Carter vs Samantha Matthews6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSharon Kisch / Kari Graham vs Annie Bennett / Elizabeth Barrow6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCeleste Gardner vs Liz Tenuta7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Lee / Janice Nelson vs Mary Ireland / Norma Goldman7-6, 6-4
2025-05-12vs VCC GREENLost 23
W#1 DoublesAmber Harris / Jackie Smith vs Lindsey Bye / Stacy Johnson6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesEmily Carter vs Shelbee Riehl5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKari Graham / Lori Lee vs Jessica Lerchbacher / Rachel Hillis6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKelli Swan vs Jill Savela0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Shaw / Janice Nelson vs Sarah Esther / Kathy Etheridge0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-05vs PCC GOLDWon 32
W#1 DoublesJackie Smith / Amber Harris vs Adrienne Cramer / Laura Dayton6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesEmily Carter vs Erica Haycock6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKari Graham / Sharon Kisch vs Shantel Poole / Whitney Vaccari1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKelli Swan vs Hilary Huckemeyer6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCeleste Gardner / Michele Shaw vs Amy Cook / Renee Dyer6-7, 6-7
2025-04-28vs SS-LT NAVYWon 41
W#1 DoublesErika Pope / Jackie Smith vs Chris Patterson / Jennifer Swiecki4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Carter vs Meghan Mariner2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKari Graham / Sharon Kisch vs Katherine Barnes / Anastasia Glennie3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKelli Swan vs Christine Gish7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCeleste Gardner / Michele Shaw vs Jennifer Renard / Charla Beram6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-21vs LTFC BLUEWon 41
L#1 DoublesSharon Kisch / Jackie Smith vs Katie Credle / Gwyn Scheel4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesEmily Carter vs Shelby Mcguire6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKari Graham / Lori Lee vs Elizabeth Mccullough / Shelley Maloney6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCeleste Gardner vs Anjanette Steadman7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmber Harris / Janice Nelson vs Amy Land / Gina Ernst6-1, 6-1
2025-04-14vs PRKR NAVYWon 50
W#1 DoublesErika Pope / Jackie Smith vs Gelsey Azhderian / Stephanie Smith6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Carter vs Susan Goldman6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Harris / Janice Nelson vs Wendy Eckert / Lisa Mullins7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKelli Swan vs Shannon Fronapfel6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLori Lee / Michele Shaw vs Robin Mortenson / Katherine Wilson6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Kelli Swan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.99
Erika Pope
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Amber Harris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Emily Carter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.80
Sharon Kisch
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Stephanie Enright
published
2.69
Kari Graham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Celeste Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.63
Lori Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Michele Shaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jackie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Graham + Celeste Gardner5165% games+11.9% vs expected
Kari Graham + Lori Lee8455% games+8.2% vs expected
Stephanie Enright + Erika Pope9657% games+7.6% vs expected
Celeste Gardner + Lori Lee8755% games+3.2% vs expected
Sharon Kisch + Kari Graham261751% games+3.0% vs expected
Sharon Kisch + Erika Pope24759% games+0.5% vs expected
Jackie Smith + Erika Pope5162% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Kisch + Stephanie Enright314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kelli Swan
102W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Erika Pope
101W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Amber Harris
41W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Emily Carter
30W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Sharon Kisch
179W–105L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Stephanie Enright
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Kari Graham
95W–79L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Celeste Gardner
87W–86L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Lori Lee
35W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Michele Shaw
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.60
Jackie Smith
22W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.