Teams

Jackson/40/6.5/Combo/LCRC

2026 Lake Charles Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women · 6.5 LC (40&O) Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesShelly Brescher / Anitra Mouton vs Julie Roussel / Sherry Pfantz6-4, 7-5
2026-08-23vs Chenet/40/6.5/CW/LCRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKendrea Terrell / Amber Comeaux vs Denise Oubre / Jamie Kirsch7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobin Camp / Cammie Olney vs M Eastman / Cynthia Cormier6-3
W#3 DoublesAudra Jackson / Shelly Brescher vs Laurie Callaba / Kayla LeJeune7-6, 7-6
2026-08-16Lost 01
L#3 DoublesShelly Brescher / Aimee Hankin vs Jessica Williamson / Blair Lumpkin6-7, 2-6
2026-08-16vs Harper/40/6.5/CW/LCRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAudra Jackson / Shelly Brescher vs Michelle Lafleur / Mona Hastings3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVickie Anderson / Melissa Brown vs Mary Theresa Miller / Marlene Walker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPenny Duffy / Cathleen Bourg vs Darla Meyer / Wendy Harper3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 LC (40&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Kendrea Terrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Robin Camp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Audra Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Vickie Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Amber Comeaux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Cathleen Bourg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Penny Duffy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Penny Misse
published
2.85
Cammie Olney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Shelly Brescher
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kendrea Terrell + Amber Comeaux4261% games+12.7% vs expected
Vickie Anderson + Audra Jackson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendrea Terrell
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Robin Camp
8W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Audra Jackson
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Vickie Anderson
13W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.08
3
Amber Comeaux
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Cathleen Bourg
26W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Penny Duffy
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
Penny Misse
41W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Cammie Olney
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
2.85
Shelly Brescher
17W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.