Teams

LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 55MX6.0A

2023 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX6.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-05vs BAY TREES PK 55MX6.0BWon 10
W#2 DoublesNilo Clava / Michelle Watkins vs Linda Duchscherer / Jeffrey Robinson6-0, 6-0
2023-10-29vs DIAMOND HILLS 55MX6.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Watkins / Robert Chuck vs Tirupathi Venkatesh / Tina Lugo6-3, 6-2
2023-10-01vs BAY TREES PK 55MX6.0BWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Watkins / Robert Chuck vs Gloria Sue / Christopher Pagel7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-09-20vs BAY TREES PK 55MX6.0BWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Watkins / Nilo Clava vs Kasey Chung / Chandra Mundra6-2, 6-1
2023-09-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Chuck / Michelle Watkins vs Gary Peer / Parto Karimi3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Nilo Clava
published
3.27
Lily Boris
published
3.11
Gary Fries
published
2.98
Bob Koury
published 3
2.90
Olga Sokolov
published
2.90
Maria Debenedetti
published
Michelle Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Grace Man
published
2.64
Suzanne Koga
published
2.62
David Bogdonoff
published 3
2.61
Charlotte Niel
published 3
2.61
LyLy Kim
published
2.51
Bob Yee
published 3
2.44
Debra Aurora
published 3
Elaine Hackenkamp
published
Ignatius Chan
published
Nick Halatsis
published
Robert Chuck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Debenedetti + Bob Koury4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nilo Clava
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Lily Boris
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Gary Fries
28W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Bob Koury
47W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
Olga Sokolov
17W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Maria Debenedetti
29W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Michelle Watkins
50W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Grace Man
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74
Suzanne Koga
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
3
David Bogdonoff
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Charlotte Niel
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
LyLy Kim
24W–24L career · no lines in 2023
0%22%78%
2.61
3
Bob Yee
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Debra Aurora
1W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.44
Elaine Hackenkamp
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ignatius Chan
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nick Halatsis
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Chuck
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.