← Teams

SHC-Heck/Salisbury

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Betty Roux
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Nancy Salisbury
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Nancy Heck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2018-11-25Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesNancy Salisbury / Debie Stellway vs Dar Dragoon / Rosaleen Harte6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Heck / Robin Welter vs Katherine Fisher / Marianne ODoherty6-2, 7-5
2018-11-10Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesDebie Stellway / Nancy Salisbury vs Ann-Marie Lundberg / Jennifer Thompson6-3, 6-3
2018-11-04Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesNancy Salisbury / Robin Welter vs Laura Fredericksen / Raquel Rich7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Heck / Liz Brenny vs Penny Langland / Tomoko Langworthy6-4, 6-1
2018-11-04Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesBetty Roux / Robin Welter vs Sally Miller / Marilyn Soljaga6-1, 6-0
2018-11-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDebie Stellway / Nancy Salisbury vs Anne Mangan / Michele Levis6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBetty Roux / Sara Meier vs Sally Miller / Nancy Tarbell6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Heck / Susan Calabro vs Sandy Remington / Julie Yang6-4, 6-3
2018-09-29Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesNancy Salisbury / Nancy Heck vs Barb Gardner / Susan Lindahl5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2018-09-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesNancy Heck / Nancy Salisbury vs Diane Apperson / Susan Belluschi7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBetty Roux / Robin Welter vs Karen Tassinari / Kathleen Ellis6-2, 6-0
2018-09-08Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesNancy Salisbury / Nancy Heck vs MaryLou Strong / Jennifer Thompson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Betty Roux
101W–106L career · type A
18%82%0%
3.08
3
Nancy Salisbury
58W–46L career
0%82%18%
2.98
3
Nancy Heck
17W–17L career
6%92%2%
2.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.