Teams

The Old Gang

2026 55 & OVER MEN · 9.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-14vs HurtWon 20
W#1 DoublesPeter Krulevitch / Bobby Palmer vs William Hurt / William Paipa7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTodd Ermenio / Scott Works vs Scott Flores / Luis Moreno6-2, 6-0
2026-04-11vs HurtWon 20
W#1 DoublesBobby Palmer / Steven Gilmer vs Lowell Goodman / Luis Moreno6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTodd Ermenio / Hector Trevino vs William Hurt / William Paipa6-4, 6-2
2026-03-29vs HurtWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Krulevitch / Brad Nabers vs Lewis Chandler / Luis Moreno6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBobby Duran / Bryan Poss vs Christopher Bingham / Ralph Totorica6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTodd Ermenio / Bobby Palmer vs William Paipa / William Hurt6-3, 6-1
2026-03-22vs HurtWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Works / Richard Perry vs William Hurt / William Sandlin6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Caskey / Hector Trevino vs William Paipa / Lewis Chandler6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBobby Palmer / Guillermo Martin del Campo vs Scott Flores / Lowell Goodman6-4, 6-1
2026-03-20vs HurtWon 20
W#1 DoublesTodd Ermenio / Brad Nabers vs William Paipa / Lewis Chandler6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBryan Poss / Steven Gilmer vs Scott Flores / Michael Ward6-0, 6-2
2026-03-01vs HurtWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Krulevitch / Bobby Palmer vs William Paipa / William Sandlin6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHector Trevino / Guillermo Martin del Campo vs William Hurt / Robert Wood6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Caskey / Todd Ermenio vs Michael Ward / Luis Moreno6-2, 6-4
2026-02-22vs HurtWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrad Nabers / Peter Krulevitch vs Robert Wood / Luis Moreno6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBobby Duran / Bryan Poss vs Ralph Totorica / Christopher Bingham6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichael Caskey / Bobby Palmer vs William Sandlin / William Paipa7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.62
Peter Krulevitch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Bobby Duran
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.33
Michael Caskey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.27
Todd Ermenio
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.25
Hector Trevino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Bryan Poss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Guillermo Martin del Campo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Bobby Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.82
Brad Nabers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Scott Works
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Steven Gilmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hector Trevino + Bryan Poss1440% games−16.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Krulevitch
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.62
4.5
Bobby Duran
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.41
Michael Caskey
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.33
Todd Ermenio
15W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Hector Trevino
63W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Bryan Poss
23W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Guillermo Martin del Campo
18W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.13
4
Bobby Palmer
16W–14L career · type A · 13 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Brad Nabers
9W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Scott Works
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Gilmer
64W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.