Teams

GJTC VLAMBDIN

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - WS

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-20vs GJTC JJOLLEYLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Dokoupil / Valerie Lambdin vs Megan Barnhurst / Lisa Belnap4-6, 2-6
2021-07-12vs GJTC HBOUMATARWon 10
W#1 SinglesTaya McCallum vs Hannah Bou-Matar6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-06vs GJTC JJOLLEYWon 10
W#2 DoublesTaya McCallum / Kiri Woodmore vs Jeena Jolley / Amy Stegelmeier6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-02vs GJTC HBOUMATARWon 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Lambdin / Taya McCallum vs Eileen Arja / Heather Shuman7-5, 6-3
2021-06-23vs GJTC JJOLLEYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCathy Dokoupil / Diana Beehler vs Lisa Belnap / Celeste Quarnberg3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesValerie Lambdin / Taya McCallum vs Theresa Heer / Kim Yerkes6-1, 6-0
2021-06-21vs GJTC HBOUMATARLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Killian / Cathy Dokoupil vs Kathy Ludlam / Heather Shuman3-6, 2-6
2021-06-16vs GJTC HBOUMATARWon 10
W#1 DoublesCathy Dokoupil / Cheryl Bodie vs Eileen Arja / Kathy Ludlam6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-14vs GJTC JJOLLEYLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Killian / Cathy Dokoupil vs Stephanie Rush / Jeena Jolley1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Taya McCallum
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
2.92
Cathy Dokoupil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Lorene Ramirez
published
2.69
Diana Beehler
published 3
2.68
Cynthia Bulgier
published 3
2.50
Kiri Woodmore
published
Cheryl Bodie
published
Michelle Killian
published
Shelly Hurt
published
Valerie Lambdin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Hurt + Valerie Lambdin9952% games−2.9% vs expected
Diana Beehler + Valerie Lambdin224 matchesnot enough data
Lorene Ramirez + Diana Beehler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Taya McCallum
121W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.69
3
Cathy Dokoupil
68W–56L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
Lorene Ramirez
33W–14L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Diana Beehler
27W–39L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Cynthia Bulgier
13W–20L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Kiri Woodmore
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
2.50
Cheryl Bodie
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Killian
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelly Hurt
38W–27L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Valerie Lambdin
39W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.