Teams

RRTC PURPLE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-02vs SS-LT BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanice Ramirez / Brigette Denning vs Angie Van Wyk / Audrey Simkins6-4, 6-4
2024-08-26vs PRC PURPLESplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrigette Denning vs Karen Bielenberg6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSiobhan Zane / Kristabel Carter vs Shawna Allen / Lorri Basile7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2024-08-19vs CPV BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Adams / Brigette Denning vs Betsy Heggie / Amy Sutherland6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-12vs SS-LT GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrigette Denning / Becky Adams vs Tara Crockett / Rebecca Dalzell6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-08-05vs SH BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesSiobhan Zane vs Bongsook Riewe6-4, 6-4
2024-07-29vs CCV REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesSiobhan Zane vs Kelli Nesbitt6-4, 6-4
2024-07-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulianna Haahs / Siobhan Zane vs Susan Goldman / Adrienne Brown6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Marissa Murray
published
3.43
Sarah Turner
published
3.32
Janice Ramirez
published
2.97
Elizabeth Luce
published
2.90
Becky Adams
published 3
2.84
Siobhan Zane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.75
Brigette Denning
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.70
Tammy Holder
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marissa Murray + Sarah Turner6259% games+13.6% vs expected
Janice Ramirez + Sarah Turner404 matchesnot enough data
Siobhan Zane + Brigette Denning303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marissa Murray
38W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.69
Sarah Turner
52W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Janice Ramirez
40W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Elizabeth Luce
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Becky Adams
19W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Siobhan Zane
60W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Brigette Denning
35W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Tammy Holder
86W–78L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.