Teams

SStorck/KDillard (Rama); Strings Attached

2025-2026 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 3.5 Women Doubles; Daytime

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-01-18vs JWilken (Rea Woods); Got an Ace?Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Waddell / Melissa Habegger vs Diana Blocker / Sarah Garner6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Storck / Linda Lober vs Gina Arado / Julie Johnson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-09vs KBattle (Sardis); Tuesday FoldersLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Waddell / Melissa Habegger vs Kimberly Battle / Amanda Tomlinson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-02vs CAcevedo/NCostello (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Storck / Linda Lober vs Natalie Costello / Christy ACEVEDO6-4, 6-4
2025-12-10vs ASofsian (PCC); A Little DeuceyLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Dillard / Christina Waddell vs Ashley Sofsian / Anna Troppmann7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-20vs ASpanjers (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Waddell / Melissa Habegger vs Jennifer Paloski / Kelly Mosby6-0, 7-6
2025-11-05vs JCook (WSRC); Court-tini QueensWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Storck / Kimberly Dillard vs April Greer / Brandi Hoover6-2, 6-4
2025-11-04vs CMixon (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Habegger / Linda Lober vs Jennifer Danesis / Maren Juell1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings27 teams · 3.5 Women Doubles; Daytime
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Melissa Habegger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Sharon Storck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Christina Waddell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Kimberly Dillard
published
3.02
Linda Lober
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Habegger + Christina Waddell332753% games−0.2% vs expected
Sharon Storck + Linda Lober101248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melissa Habegger
120W–81L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Sharon Storck
95W–93L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Christina Waddell
84W–106L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
Kimberly Dillard
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
Linda Lober
65W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.