Teams

HIT, Siddiqui

2026 18&Over Men · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.86 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-22vs EAC, Subject/DulbergLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Pileggi / Rohan Halder vs Joseph Mead / Alex Pojero4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesZak Siddiqui vs Kevin Peters3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesChristopher Kehayes vs Steve Subject6-3, 6-1
2026-07-21vs Lynbrook, Mosquera/BrahmbhattLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Pileggi / Justin Ullman vs Steven Ross / Krishna Kambhampati6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristopher Kehayes vs Jesse Bodony2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesZak Siddiqui / Rohan Halder vs Danny Sturm / Zachary Fine1-6, 4-6
2026-07-15vs Deer Park, Ramo/DikmanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChris Pileggi / Justin Ullman vs Anthony LaRocca / Kevin Bunting7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesZak Siddiqui vs Thomas Montanaro6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Hallak / Marco Papaleo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesGraig Sammis vs Marvin Beaubrun2-6, 1-6
2026-07-08vs Kings Park, Jackson/SerbinLost 13
L#1 DoublesChris Pileggi / Marco Papaleo vs Stephen Weiss / Hanke Kimm7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNoah Ramos vs Andrew Villalta1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGraig Sammis / Daniel Hallak vs Benjamin A Vassallo / Avi Bajaj1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAnthony Lopresti vs Erdal Kadioglu2-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs LI: Syosset, HymanLost 04
L#1 DoublesChris Pileggi / Justin Ullman vs Matthew Celentano / Edwin Mulhern3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesIshan Shah vs Jonathan Wasserman0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesZak Siddiqui / Zain Siddiqui vs Daniel Celentano / Neil Hyman2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRohan Halder / Graig Sammis vs Alin Haruray / Matthew Majorana0-6, 0-6
2026-06-24vs Long Beach, KlausnerWon 41
W#1 DoublesChris Pileggi / Justin Ullman vs Jordan Klausner / SHAHZEB MIRZA7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesZak Siddiqui vs Sean Chhugani4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRohan Halder / Graig Sammis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDattatraya Kamatkar vs Isaac Rauchwerger6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesZain Siddiqui / Daniel Hallak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-01vs EAC, Subject/DulbergLost 14
L#1 DoublesZak Siddiqui / Chris Pileggi vs Michael Casamassima / STEVEN MATHEW2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Kehayes vs Shane Duerr1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNoah Ramos / Anthony Lopresti vs Dan Derosalia / Ian Zaslansky2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesIshan Shah vs Alex Pojero6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGraig Sammis / Zain Siddiqui vs Brian Connor / Michael Schoolman1-6, 0-6
2026-05-28vs Deer Park, Ramo/DikmanLost 05
L#1 DoublesChris Pileggi / Justin Ullman vs Louis Zamboli / Jim Calandra4-6, 6-6
L#1 SinglesZak Siddiqui vs Chris Brewer2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGraig Sammis / Ishan Shah vs Kevin Monahan / John Ramo0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesNoah Ramos vs Marvin Beaubrun1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDaniel Hallak / Rohan Halder vs Jason Stybel / Justin Stybel0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anthony Lopresti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.69
Dattatraya Kamatkar
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.63
Justin Ullman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Zak Siddiqui
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.51
Noah Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.50
Chris Pileggi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Zain Siddiqui
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Christopher Kehayes
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Rohan Halder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Ishan Shah
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.28
Graig Sammis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.11
Daniel Hallak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Marco Papaleo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Ullman + Chris Pileggi2349% games−4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Lopresti
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Dattatraya Kamatkar
37W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
Justin Ullman
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Zak Siddiqui
9W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Noah Ramos
18W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Chris Pileggi
2W–9L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Zain Siddiqui
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Christopher Kehayes
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Rohan Halder
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.38
4
Ishan Shah
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.35
4
Graig Sammis
1W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.28
3.5
Daniel Hallak
2W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
Marco Papaleo
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.