Teams

BTA-IBM RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-18vs LTA-P REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesEva Raschke / Rebekah Davis vs Gloria Andrews / Jennifer Arndt6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Germano vs Stephanie Stone3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Therond / Deborah Puro vs Kate Moin / Kris Graham4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Meese / Jenny Zuckerman vs Alicia Hillen / Sally Meier0-6, 4-6
2024-07-11vs CVTA ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesEva Raschke / Judy Therond vs Bethany Sartell / Jenna Prey6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebekah Davis / Deborah Puro vs Alisa Mallinger / Melissa Balcerak7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Germano / Jenny Zuckerman vs Michelle Karr / Carmen Gunn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-04vs LTA-Q GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRebekah Davis / Ardith Falkner vs Camille Benton / Lori Preston2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNina Rodd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJudy Therond / Jennifer Germano vs Julie Benson / Emily Pieper5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEva Raschke / Deborah Puro vs Dena Stark / Claire Schlosser2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-27vs MEA GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesRebekah Davis / Susi Gardner vs Leslie Allen / Tamara Harvey6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesArdith Falkner vs Jennifer Mitchell6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Riley / Aimee Snow vs Alice Madden / Sarah Streett4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Puro / Jennifer Germano vs Emily Stinchcomb / Julie von Eschen3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-06-20vs BCC NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesSusi Gardner / Nina Rodd vs Annah Worland / Ashley Devery6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEva Raschke vs Brooke Harrison4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Puro / Ardith Falkner vs Elizabeth Bigelow / Jackie Kramer1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Zuckerman / Laura Meese vs Allison Faldi / Mary Pfeiffer1-6, 0-6
2024-06-13vs RMTC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesArdith Falkner / Eva Raschke vs Carmel Gill / Pat Noyes6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLaura Meese vs Tsugumi Richards1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Germano / Rebekah Davis vs Leslie Krug / Thelma Condon3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAimee Snow / Heather Riley vs Karen Deierhoi / Emiko Childs6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-06vs LAC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusi Gardner / Ardith Falkner vs Tracy King / Susan Rasmussen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebekah Davis / Eva Raschke vs Jackye Whalen / Linda Schutter4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDeborah Puro / Jenny Zuckerman vs Ann Fitzgerald / Charlotte Marsh0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Susi Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Judy Therond
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Ardith Falkner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Nina Rodd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Jennifer Germano
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Rebekah Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Eva Raschke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Aimee Snow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Deborah Puro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jenny Zuckerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Meese
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Therond + Jennifer Germano10360% games+7.4% vs expected
Rebekah Davis + Judy Therond6451% games+0.5% vs expected
Rebekah Davis + Eva Raschke6452% games−2.1% vs expected
Rebekah Davis + Ardith Falkner3249% games−5.2% vs expected
Judy Therond + Ardith Falkner5063% gamesnot enough data
Rebekah Davis + Susi Gardner314 matchesnot enough data
Rebekah Davis + Jennifer Germano134 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Zuckerman + Susi Gardner134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Susi Gardner
40W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Judy Therond
31W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Ardith Falkner
59W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Nina Rodd
41W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Jennifer Germano
37W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.36
Rebekah Davis
36W–44L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Eva Raschke
68W–31L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Aimee Snow
18W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Deborah Puro
11W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jenny Zuckerman
2W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Meese
0W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.