Teams

GR-Clemmons 65s 3.0W SP

2025 Neuse River Adult 65 & Over League · 3.0 Women 65 & over

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesMona McConnaughey / Brenda Jones vs Lulu Conekin / Yvonne Kleiman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSheri Fine / Brenda Hardison vs Lori Baker / Pam Taylor4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Clemmons / Sharon Lay vs Rebecca King / Laura Sweet1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMargaret Clemmons / Mona McConnaughey vs Yvonne Kleiman / Pam Taylor3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSheri Fine / Brenda Hardison vs Lori Baker / Tammie Hudspeth3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Lay / Mary Jane Thomassen vs Brenda Johnson / Laura Sweet1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesBrenda Jones / Sheri Fine vs Lulu Conekin / Yvonne Kleiman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Clemmons / Brenda Hardison vs Lori Baker / Laura Sweet0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMary Jane Thomassen / Sharon Lay vs Tammie Hudspeth / Debbie Stephenson2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesBrenda Jones / Shumena Horton vs Lulu Conekin / Yvonne Kleiman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSheri Fine / Sharon Lay vs Lori Baker / Pam Taylor4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Clemmons / Jenny Dempsey vs Tammie Hudspeth / Brenda Johnson1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesShumena Horton / Jenny Dempsey vs Lulu Conekin / Yvonne Kleiman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Hardison / Brenda Jones vs Lori Baker / Pam Taylor1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Jane Thomassen / Sharon Lay vs Rebecca King / Debbie Stephenson0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesShumena Horton / Brenda Jones vs Lori Baker / Pam Taylor6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Lay / Brenda Hardison vs Lulu Conekin / Yvonne Kleiman2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Clemmons / Mary Jane Thomassen vs Brenda Johnson / Rebecca King0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 65 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Sheri Fine
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Mona McConnaughey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Jenny Dempsey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.13
Mary Jane Thomassen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Sharon Lay
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.08
Brenda Hardison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Margaret Clemmons
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Shumena Horton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Jane Thomassen + Sharon Lay044 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Lay + Sheri Fine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheri Fine
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Mona McConnaughey
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Jenny Dempsey
10W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
Mary Jane Thomassen
2W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.13
Sharon Lay
7W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Brenda Hardison
12W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Margaret Clemmons
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shumena Horton
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.