Teams

LDUP-UPCHURCH/LNRC 55+ 7.5 Mon pm

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Women 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-10-07vs LKED-Edge /RRLost 12
L#1 DoublesNoreen Soos / Kim Molke vs Sharon Kerns / Kathleen Navola1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Marie McPherson / Donna Upchurch vs Kimberly Robbins / Julli Goodwin3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Mudge / Sherry Lerme vs Lori Moon / Janet Scott3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-10-01vs LKED-Edge /RRWon 21
W#1 DoublesNoreen Soos / Kim Molke vs Karen Edge / Sharon Kerns6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDonna Strauss / Lisa Smith vs Janet Scott / Lori Moon1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Mudge / Liz Littlefield vs Lisa Lawrence / Kathleen Navola4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-30vs LBKO-Kosior/EdgemoorLost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Hulse-Mack / Noreen Soos vs Karen Allison / Barbara Kosior3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Mudge / Victoria Peaire vs Jane Heredia / Elizabeth Holum3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Strauss / Carol Cousins vs Cindy Peterson / Annie Edenfield5-7, 4-6
2024-09-23vs LLFO-Foreman-Ray/NMPWon 21
W#1 DoublesNoreen Soos / Jill Hulse-Mack vs Anna Bonham / Leslie Shipley7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Smith / Donna Strauss vs Elizabeth Foreman / Anita Honeycutt4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLiz Littlefield / Julie Mudge vs Suzun McCrary / Debbie Beam3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-09-09vs LBKO-Kosior/EdgemoorLost 12
W#1 DoublesDonna Upchurch / Noreen Soos vs Linda Dove / Janet Harmon6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDonna Strauss / Ann Marie McPherson vs Stephanie Clancy / Elana Fedor0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Michalski / Sherry Lerme vs Tracey McKenna / Elizabeth Holum3-6, 3-6
2024-09-02vs LLFO-Foreman-Ray/NMPWon 20
W#1 DoublesNoreen Soos / Kim Molke vs Nancy Zylstra / Christine Bogojevich7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDonna Upchurch / Liz Littlefield vs Karen Ray / Anita Honeycutt3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-26vs LKED-Edge /RRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVictoria Peaire / Donna Upchurch vs Mary Kennedy / Jann Debord2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCarol Cousins / Donna Strauss vs Janet Scott / Tracey Marchitelli6-2, 6-3
2024-08-19vs LBKO-Kosior/EdgemoorLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Mudge / Noreen Soos vs Elana Fedor / Cindy Peterson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKim Molke / Carol Cousins vs Deidre Norton / Stephanie Clancy5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Upchurch / Sherry Lerme vs Annie Edenfield / Janet Harmon4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-08-12vs LLFO-Foreman-Ray/NMPWon 30
W#1 DoublesSherry Lerme / Kim Molke vs Anna Bonham / Jennifer Joiner6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVictoria Peaire / Julie Mudge vs Anita Honeycutt / Nancy Zylstra6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDonna Strauss / Lisa Smith vs Debbie Beam / Suzun McCrary6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Donna Upchurch
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Kim Molke
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Julie Mudge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Lisa van Arnam
published 4
3.30
Donna Strauss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Noreen Soos
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Sherry Lerme
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Carol Cousins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Jill Hulse-Mack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Amy Michalski
published 3.5
2.97
Liz Littlefield
published
Tammy McGahan
published
Victoria Peaire
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Lerme + Noreen Soos6551% gamesnot enough data
Julie Mudge + Donna Upchurch5263% gamesnot enough data
Julie Mudge + Kim Molke123 matchesnot enough data
Noreen Soos + Kim Molke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donna Upchurch
141W–107L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Kim Molke
38W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Julie Mudge
102W–90L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Lisa van Arnam
102W–91L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Donna Strauss
28W–38L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Noreen Soos
109W–121L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Sherry Lerme
90W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Carol Cousins
50W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Jill Hulse-Mack
70W–101L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Amy Michalski
2W–15L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Liz Littlefield
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Tammy McGahan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Peaire
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.