Teams

WNCS Heinitsh (BFCC)

Adult 18 & Over WNC USTA 2025 · 18 & O 3.0 Women Monday evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-19vs WNCL Donaldson (HRC)Split 22
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hooper / Katherine McCann vs Arianna Bovo Trnka / Andrea Smith2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLydia Harrell vs Ellie Hoffman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatherine Morosani / Emily West vs Caroline Patterson / Lisa Donaldson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Freeman / Katina Turner vs Rhonda Walsingham / Caterine Fares6-3, 6-2
2025-05-05vs WNCA Sturgill (Aston)Won 31
W#1 DoublesSusie Heinitsh / Lydia Harrell vs Micah Nielsen / Colleen Riley6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCaroline Perry vs Abigail Sturgill6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSumandeep Groh / Amelia McCormick vs Lindsay Broughel / Anna Smith0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLauren Komanski vs Catharine Connell6-2, 6-1
2025-05-01vs WNCL Donaldson (HRC)Won 41
W#1 DoublesSusie Heinitsh / Emily West vs Maureen Bowdren / Caroline Patterson6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmelia McCormick vs Natasha Hilton6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Freeman / Katherine Morosani vs Rhonda Walsingham / Caterine Fares6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCaroline Perry vs Arianna Bovo Trnka6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLauren Komanski / Lydia Harrell vs Lisa Donaldson / JeriBeth Stevens6-1, 6-0
2025-04-28vs WNCE Eastwood (CC of A)Won 50
W#1 DoublesSusie Heinitsh / Lydia Harrell vs Jenifer Bolton / Sundri Simon6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCaroline Perry vs Jessi White4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Hooper / Elizabeth Freeman vs Mandy Kelleher / Justine Amdur6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLauren Komanski vs Katie Nery6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmelia McCormick / Katherine Morosani vs Rebecca Dent / Amy Rowe7-5, 6-1
2025-04-21vs WNCP van Vonno (ARC S)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesKatina Turner / Susie Heinitsh vs Hannah Singleton / Virginia Scarola2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Komanski vs Jennifer Gillis1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Freeman / Susan Groh vs Miluska Kusz / Michelle Shires3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesLydia Harrell vs Patricia van Vonno3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCatherine Hooper / Katherine McCann vs Jennifer German / Marcella Lanius5-7, 4-6
2025-04-14vs WNCN Stanton (ARC S)Split 22
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hooper / Katina Turner vs Megan Bennett / Kimberly Waggle4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKatherine Morosani vs Jennifer Malt6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusie Heinitsh / Emily West vs Sally Boerschig / Sammie Vittoria6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKatherine McCann / Amelia McCormick vs Nicole O'Brien / Kelly McDill3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & O 3.0 Women Monday evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Caroline Perry
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Lydia Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.92
Susie Heinitsh
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.86
Emily West
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Catherine Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Amelia McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Sumandeep Groh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Katherine Morosani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Katherine McCann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Katina Turner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Komanski
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Marilyn Brown
published
Susan Groh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Heinitsh + Lydia Harrell5162% games+14.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Perry
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Lydia Harrell
18W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Susie Heinitsh
16W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Emily West
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Catherine Hooper
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Amelia McCormick
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Sumandeep Groh
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Katherine Morosani
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.60
Katherine McCann
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katina Turner
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Komanski
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marilyn Brown
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Groh
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.