Teams

LABR Brandon/Jetton

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · 8.5 Women Fri

9 players · average NTRP 4.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-26vs LCRI-Richards/CSDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Scherrman / Janet Szilagyi vs Christine Richards / Elizabeth Krogstie6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Uzarski / Julie Mudge vs Brenda Levy / Peg Blomme3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-13vs LCRI-Richards/CSDWon 20
W#2 DoublesFelicia Dean / Debbie Newman vs Brenda Levy / Elizabeth Krogstie6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Uzarski / Donna Upchurch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-12vs LCRI-Richards/CSDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Uzarski / Donna Upchurch vs Christine Richards / Liz Barton1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFelicia Dean / Debbie Newman vs Dora Burdzinska-Drezek / Michelle Potuzak6-2, 7-6
2025-09-03vs LCRI-Richards/CSDWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Uzarski / Donna Upchurch vs Christine Richards / Lisa Scott6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLori Scherrman / Julie Mudge vs Brenda Levy / Elizabeth Krogstie6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFelicia Dean / Janet Szilagyi vs Dora Burdzinska-Drezek / Gretchen Kohlhepp6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women Fri have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Lori Scherrman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Felicia Dean
published
4.18
Courtney Rowe
published 4.5
4.06
Susan Uzarski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.91
Donna Upchurch
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.82
Janet Szilagyi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Julie Mudge
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.55
Amy Brandon
published 4
3.52
Debbie Newman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Scherrman + Janet Szilagyi6553% gamesnot enough data
Susan Uzarski + Debbie Newman5553% gamesnot enough data
Lori Scherrman + Julie Mudge4450% gamesnot enough data
Julie Mudge + Donna Upchurch5263% gamesnot enough data
Susan Uzarski + Donna Upchurch4261% gamesnot enough data
Lori Scherrman + Susan Uzarski3259% gamesnot enough data
Julie Mudge + Janet Szilagyi3254% gamesnot enough data
Julie Mudge + Susan Uzarski134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lori Scherrman
133W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
Felicia Dean
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Courtney Rowe
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Susan Uzarski
127W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Donna Upchurch
141W–107L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Julie Mudge
102W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Amy Brandon
16W–30L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Debbie Newman
67W–94L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.