Teams

LA - Griffin Club

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - LA · LA - Women 4.0 WD

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-13vs LA - The Dream TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Holstein / Tammy Finestone vs Stacie Smiley / Kelly Nielson3-6, 1-6
2025-06-10vs LA - ServeranceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTammy Finestone / Leah Lavin vs Jamie Bracco / Susan Kneafsey6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLily Crummy / Nicole Martino vs Megan Drynan / Jennifer Foley2-6, 3-6
2025-05-02vs LA - ServeranceLost 01
L#1 DoublesShannon Minor / Lily Crummy vs Ali Baird / Gayle Byrne2-6, 0-6
2025-04-18vs LA - MountainGateLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Holstein / Lisa Kusayanagi vs Antonieta Monaldi / Rachel Czer2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Leah Lavin
published
3.79
Jeannette Hartsock
published
3.79
Tammy Finestone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Lisa Kusayanagi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Phyllis Crotty
published
3.60
Shannon Minor
published
3.60
Julie Blackwell
published
3.58
Lily Crummy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.39
Nicole Martino
published
3.37
Shelly Janger
published
Debra Holstein
published 3.5
3.12
Damla Dogan
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kusayanagi + Tammy Finestone4259% gamesnot enough data
Lily Crummy + Tammy Finestone4255% gamesnot enough data
Julie Blackwell + Leah Lavin404 matchesnot enough data
Lily Crummy + Shannon Minor224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Kusayanagi + Leah Lavin213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Kusayanagi + Jeannette Hartsock033 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Martino + Tammy Finestone123 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Minor + Shelly Janger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Lavin
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Jeannette Hartsock
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Tammy Finestone
95W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Lisa Kusayanagi
46W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Phyllis Crotty
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Shannon Minor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
Julie Blackwell
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Lily Crummy
30W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Nicole Martino
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Shelly Janger
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Debra Holstein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Damla Dogan
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.