Teams

Refunds

2026 Tri Level 18 and Above · REFUNDS

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for REFUNDS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James McDonald
published 3.5
3.16
Mateus Barbian Urio
published
3.10
Jessica Beissner
published
3.04
Lakisha Dawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Veda Moore
published
2.70
Suzanne Lea
published
2.62
Janice Sams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Megan Pender
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Crystal Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Geneva Colie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Krishna Tiwari
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Dawson + Megan Pender5449% games+5.6% vs expected
Geneva Colie + Megan Pender134 matchesnot enough data
Lakisha Dawson + Megan Pender303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
James McDonald
5W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mateus Barbian Urio
3W–8L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Jessica Beissner
18W–13L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Lakisha Dawson
52W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.04
Veda Moore
12W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Suzanne Lea
9W–16L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Janice Sams
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
Megan Pender
29W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%58%42%
2.47
2.5
Crystal Dawson
19W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Geneva Colie
16W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Krishna Tiwari
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.