← Teams

LOTC-Kraft

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Wendi Ouellette
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Jane Paulsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Robin Fernstrom
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Julia Henry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.21
Natasha Rinard
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Robyn Hilden
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2025-03-21Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesRobyn Hilden / Robin Fernstrom vs Kiersten Lake / Chris van Leeuwen6-4, 6-3
2025-03-16Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesNatasha Rinard vs Bethany Bounds6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBritani Kavanaugh / Robin Fernstrom vs America Hopson / Amy Cooney6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Megan McCarter vs Michele Desmarais / TERESA LAWHEAD6-2, 6-0
2025-03-14Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Kara Kraft vs Callen Sterling / Andrea Hobi6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNatasha Rinard / Britani Kavanaugh vs Paula Watt / Michele O'Brien3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Fernstrom / Megan McCarter vs Patricia Eargle / Katie Terrill2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Kara Kraft vs Jennifer Pultz / Janice Ackley6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMICHELLE LY / Julia Henry vs Linda Castaneda / Catherine Greenblatt6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobyn Hilden / Robin Fernstrom vs Linda Degnan / Kim Hevia6-2, 6-3
2025-02-22Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Megan McCarter vs Emily Shue / LISA KINGDON7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKara Kraft / Natasha Rinard vs Vicki Blunt / Shelley Hutley6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesErin Keyser / Jane Paulsen vs Delena Palena / Alisa Rakoz6-3, 6-4
2025-02-03Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Megan McCarter vs Judi Babcock / Karen McNairy6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesNatasha Rinard vs Marie Dorsey6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Paulsen / Julia Henry vs Nancy Pan / Laurence Dupray6-2, 6-0
2025-01-17Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Natasha Rinard vs Nancy Korenek-Leveque / Joy Lin7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMICHELLE LY / Robyn Hilden vs Elizabeth Maguire / Robin Welter6-0, 6-3
2025-01-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Jane Paulsen vs Sammie Sue Willenborg / Lisa Wisthoff7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNatasha Rinard / Julia Henry vs Christine Taylor / Karen Groenweghe6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMegan McCarter / Robyn Hilden vs Marlene Enos / Julie Row6-2, 6-3
2025-01-05Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Megan McCarter vs HOLLY LIBERATORE / Dayna Porter6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJane Paulsen / Natasha Rinard vs Karen Pickering / Heidi Kjos6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Wendi Ouellette
177W–50L career
19%81%0%
3.55
3.5
Jane Paulsen
84W–62L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Robin Fernstrom
48W–36L career
not enough data
—
3
Julia Henry
87W–52L career
0%18%82%
3.22
3.5
Natasha Rinard
57W–51L career
3%97%0%
3.21
3.5
Robyn Hilden
86W–68L career
3%97%0%
3.20

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.