Teams

Countryside Dunn

2022 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekend · 3.0 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.14 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-11vs SPTC BernishLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Marie Lennox / Shannon David vs KELLY BOTT / Kimberly Fiorino2-6, 2-6
2022-05-21vs ELW AnkneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Marie Lennox / Marisol Cohen vs Amy Hill / Robyn Houston4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-14vs Countryside SolaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarisol Cohen / Anne Marie Lennox vs Monique Sola / Michele Sullivan6-0, 6-3
2022-05-07vs Pinellas/PriceLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Marie Lennox / Evelyn Delelys vs Elizabeth Jordan / Sally Blush6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-23vs SPTC BernishWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Marie Lennox / Marisol Cohen vs Kelly Bernish / Lisa Jacome6-2, 6-0
2022-04-16vs ELW AnkneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Lovett Dunn / Anne Marie Lennox vs Kimberly Ankney / Robyn Houston6-2, 6-3
2022-04-09vs Countryside SolaWon 10
W#1 DoublesEvelyn Delelys / Anne Marie Lennox vs Dana Galbraith / Betsy Rutkowski7-6, 6-4
2022-04-02vs Pinellas/PriceLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Marie Lennox / Marisol Cohen vs Christine Price / Elizabeth Jordan6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Tricia Lolkus
published 3.5
3.27
Anne Marie Lennox
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Daspina Malasky
published 3
2.82
Amy Lovett Dunn
published 3
2.78
Toni Miller
published
2.78
Marisol Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Bettie Romer
published 3
2.73
Kimberly Kurey
published 3
MICHELLE MARCATOS
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marisol Cohen + Anne Marie Lennox131354% games−5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tricia Lolkus
98W–60L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.50
3.5
Anne Marie Lennox
133W–91L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Daspina Malasky
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Amy Lovett Dunn
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Toni Miller
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Marisol Cohen
59W–109L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Bettie Romer
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Kimberly Kurey
21W–28L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
MICHELLE MARCATOS
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.