Teams

OWB - Rosemary Beach-Brandman

2022 OWB TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.0-3.5-3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0-3.5-3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Meg Castleberry
published
3.44
LeAnne Shumate
published
3.44
Lindy Wood
published
3.39
Michelle Asbell
published
3.33
Laurie Brown
published
3.29
Angie Gibson
published 3.5
3.27
Kim Maddox
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.03
Mary Brandman
published
2.89
Jacqueline Ward
published 3
Julie van Kirk
published
Nora Cyr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Brandman + Jacqueline Ward4358% games+0.7% vs expected
Michelle Asbell + Laurie Brown5063% gamesnot enough data
Kim Maddox + Angie Gibson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Castleberry
25W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
LeAnne Shumate
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lindy Wood
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Michelle Asbell
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Laurie Brown
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Angie Gibson
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Kim Maddox
28W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Mary Brandman
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Jacqueline Ward
24W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
2.89
Julie van Kirk
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nora Cyr
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.