Teams

ASpanjers (Queens)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-11vs JKarasek/Murphy (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnie Spanjers / Kate Terrigno vs Caroline Dudley / Megan Francis1-6, 1-6
2024-10-04vs DFricke (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlyse Fuller / Taylor Ricks vs Jennifer Voci / Karisa Douglas5-7, 1-6
2024-09-20vs ETurkus (Springfield)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAnnie Spanjers / Lea Williams vs Erica Turkus / Natalie Costello2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlyse Fuller / Taylor Ricks vs Julie Swanson / Annmarie Ringle2-6, 1-6
2024-09-06vs JKarasek/Murphy (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHollie Collins-Dean / Alyse Fuller vs Christina Murphy / Rebecca Fitzsimons0-6, 1-6
2024-08-30vs KBaldwin (Charlotte CC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTara Marcel / Annie Spanjers vs Elizabeth Jack / Lindsay Griffin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-08-16vs DFricke (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnie Spanjers / Kacy Littlehale vs Danielle Fricke / TARA RAND1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Megan McHugh
published
2.97
Annie Spanjers
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Kacy Littlehale
published
2.92
Tara Marcel
published
2.76
Kate Murphy
published
2.76
Sarah Janowitz
published
2.72
Taylor Ricks
published
2.71
Alyse Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.60
Erika Lepczyk
published 3
2.49
Kate Terrigno
published
2.48
Alexis Chaskey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kacy Littlehale + Megan McHugh6459% games−0.3% vs expected
Annie Spanjers + Alyse Fuller1731% gamesnot enough data
Alyse Fuller + Taylor Ricks224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan McHugh
27W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Annie Spanjers
68W–72L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kacy Littlehale
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
Tara Marcel
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Kate Murphy
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
Sarah Janowitz
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
Taylor Ricks
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Alyse Fuller
36W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Erika Lepczyk
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.60
Kate Terrigno
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Hollie Collins-Dean
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
Alexis Chaskey
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.