Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-30vs BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 18AM4.0BWon 30
W#1 DoublesAli Jafri / Chuo-Yun Yang vs Eric Kuchherzki / Marc Manuel6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAleksei Metalnikov vs Donald Kung4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulian Nguyen / Peter Stern vs Michael Swire / Teppei Tsutsui6-3, 6-2
2025-05-10vs TIBURON PEN C 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLeonard Chang / Atul Karmarkar vs Dana Long / Jeffrey Webb4-6, 2-6
2025-04-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeonard Chang / Nikhil Desai vs Frank Lee / Mark Stuart3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ali Jafri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
John Mccann
published
4.00
Aleksei Metalnikov
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.95
Peter Stern
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Dennis Duan
published 4
3.91
3.89
Nicholas Benson
published
3.85
Spencer Moss
published
3.84
Kelemen Papp
published
3.80
Chuo-Yun Yang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Parshudar Poonamallee Kothandaraman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Julian Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
3.71
Henny Huang
published
3.56
Esai Morales
published
Leonard Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nicholas Clark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Duan + Christopher Sycamore224 matchesnot enough data
Henny Huang + Chuo-Yun Yang314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ali Jafri
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Mccann
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
4
Aleksei Metalnikov
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
Peter Stern
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Dennis Duan
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
4
Christopher Sycamore
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
Nicholas Benson
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.89
Spencer Moss
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Kelemen Papp
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Chuo-Yun Yang
32W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Parshudar Poonamallee Kothandaraman
30W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.79
Julian Nguyen
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Lucad Ochsendorf Pacheco
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Henny Huang
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Esai Morales
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Leonard Chang
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas Clark
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.