Teams

40 LOVE

2021 DC Adult 18 & Over Summer · Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.29 / WASHINGTON D.C.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2021-05-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaeva Michiels Rikkers / Dian Zhang vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-23vs Future TitansWon 10
W#1 DoublesJ'Ana Diamond / Christen Harsha vs Diane Heyde / Heidi Schriefer6-1, 6-2
2021-05-23vs Anderson & AndersonWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Jenni Bae6-0, 6-2
2021-05-22vs Lady TitansWon 10
W#1 DoublesJ'Ana Diamond / Christen Harsha vs Aileen Jones / Roxana Schwenk6-3, 4-5
2021-05-22vs ChastainWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Kara Stevenson6-1, 6-3
2021-05-16vs Net NeutralityWon 10
W#2 DoublesPascaline Sangosse / Dian Zhang vs Gina Ryan / Kim Ngoc Tran6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-02vs Serving LoveWon 20
W#2 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Sohee Chu6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDian Zhang / Sharon Marczewski vs Chelsea Thompson / Lisa Steel6-4, 6-0
2021-05-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesDian Zhang / Sharon Marczewski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-18vs Lady TitansWon 10
W#2 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Melissa Mendoza6-1, 6-3
2021-04-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Stacey Heisler6-0, 6-2
2021-04-17vs Serve OnWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Bonnie Lefbom6-0, 6-0
2021-04-17vs GPSDCLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristen Harsha / Malini Sekhar vs Leila Lam / Jenna Hagood1-6, 5-7
2021-04-11vs Anderson & AndersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristen Harsha / Sharon Tompkins vs Jennifer Hunter / Katrina Tiedeman6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Christen Harsha
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 5
Bavi Sadayappan
published 4.5
Gianna Kang
published 4.5
4.17
Jessica Rackley
published
3.93
Dian Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Jamaine Chisholm
published 4
3.79
Sharon Tompkins
published
3.74
Cecilia Jones
published 4
3.64
Sharon Marczewski
published
3.60
Arial Pegues
published 4
Kristin Quackenbush
published
Pascaline Sangosse
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Christen Harsha
482W–135L career · 10 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
4.58
4.5
Bavi Sadayappan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Gianna Kang
16W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jessica Rackley
6W–9L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4
Dian Zhang
229W–109L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Jamaine Chisholm
20W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.88
Sharon Tompkins
14W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Cecilia Jones
48W–52L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Sharon Marczewski
53W–43L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Arial Pegues
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kristin Quackenbush
20W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pascaline Sangosse
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.