Teams

KGreathouse/JBee (Russell)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-08vs KLull/LPowell (Bridgehampton)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKarie Greathouse / Alexandra Centeno vs Deepti Dua / Virginia Katzen1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJena Lepkowski / Shannon Hemker vs Lizette Conover / Stacey Reinhardt3-6, 4-6
2025-10-01vs HLee/Rock (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Earley / Shannon Hemker vs Angela Donathan / Katie Bissett1-6, 4-6
2025-09-24vs OBanchik/NO'Brien (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKarie Greathouse / Jane Bee vs Naomi O'Brien / Anura Patel2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShannon Hemker / Ellen Underwood vs Olya Banchik / Sabrina Gregory4-6, 2-6
2025-09-17vs RAddison/KMoore (Park Road)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Barnes / Jena Lepkowski vs Anna Margaret Hutchins / Mary Kathryn Lozzi1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Centeno / Ellen Underwood vs Brittany Julian / Sallie Wilson2-6, 0-6
2025-09-10vs SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJane Bee / Karie Greathouse vs Barbara Davis / Elizabeth Kennard6-2, 6-2
2025-09-03vs VTolson/Petras (Firethorne)Won 10
W#2 DoublesEllen Underwood / Karie Greathouse vs Christina Highfield / Tracy McLaughlin1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-20vs MKelling/RJoplin (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKarie Greathouse / Robin Perkins vs Brooke Leonnig / Brooke Kline2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-08-13vs LHuntington (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKarie Greathouse / Jane Bee vs Laura Case / Claudia Prager6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jane Bee
published
3.05
Lauren Earley
published
3.04
Ellen Underwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Shannon Hemker
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Karie Greathouse
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alexandra Centeno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Anja Skljarevski
published
Jena Lepkowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Taylor James
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Bee
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Lauren Earley
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Ellen Underwood
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Shannon Hemker
1W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Karie Greathouse
66W–82L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
2.5
Alexandra Centeno
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Anja Skljarevski
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jena Lepkowski
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Taylor James
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.