Teams

Webb - Above the Net

2025 Howard Doubles Weekday Circle D · Howard Doubles Weekday Circle D 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-06-10vs Stirmers - SpinderellasLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Iosue / Susan Reichard vs Amanda ODonovan / Kathryn Painter5-7, 2-6
2025-06-09vs Stirmers - SpinderellasLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Iosue / Patricia Murphy vs Kathryn Painter / Brooke Santry2-6, 2-6
2025-06-04vs Boarman - Simply SmashingWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Bielefeld / Debby Moulding vs Cathie Boarman / Kathy Roetering6-2, 6-1
2025-05-22vs Stirmers - SpinderellasLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebby Moulding / Margaret Singh vs Sara Kowalczyk / Jennifer Sinkule0-6, 0-6
2025-05-19vs Smolen - Causin' A RacquetWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Bielefeld / Debby Moulding vs Stacey Aldrich / Kina Morton6-4, 7-6
2025-05-14vs Boarman - Simply SmashingWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Iosue / Patricia Murphy vs Lisa Shearer / Krissie Zenkewicz6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Darling / Debby Moulding vs Beverly Graham / Vera Hendon6-4, 6-0
2025-05-12vs Boarman - Simply SmashingWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Iosue / Lisa Martinez vs Angela Gardner / Krissie Zenkewicz6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-08vs Stirmers - SpinderellasLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Iosue / Cynthia Keenan vs Sara Kowalczyk / Melissa Zohdi0-6, 1-6
2025-04-30vs Boarman - Simply SmashingLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebby Moulding / Margaret Singh vs Pam Henley / Krissie Zenkewicz6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2025-04-14vs Smolen - Causin' A RacquetWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Murphy / Catherine Iosue vs Leslie Roecklein / Andrea Smolen6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Doubles Weekday Circle D 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Bunkong Wong
published 3
3.04
Carol Darling
published 3
2.87
Catherine Iosue
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Cynthia Keenan
published 3
Debbie Drown
published 3
2.62
Debby Moulding
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Robin Dickerson
published
2.52
Gail Lawson
published
Lisa Martinez
published
Patricia Murphy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bunkong Wong
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Carol Darling
45W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Catherine Iosue
127W–112L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Cynthia Keenan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Drown
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debby Moulding
46W–70L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Robin Dickerson
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Gail Lawson
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Lisa Martinez
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Murphy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.