Teams

WNCB Hollingsworth (Peachtree)

Adult 65 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 65+ Adult Women 3.0 Tues

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-03vs WNCE Liddy (HRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBetty Hollingsworth / Donna Connell vs Sammie Vittoria / Elaine Liddy2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnn McAndrews / Jacalyn Dennis vs Claudia Gavin / Jane Miller3-6, 3-6
2026-03-26vs WNCE Liddy (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Alexander Bell / Ann McAndrews vs Margaret Peggy Sanders / Patricia McClurkin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Deudne / Jacalyn Dennis vs JoAnne Dougher / Kathryn Overstreet3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRuby Bright / Janet Janda vs Elaine Liddy / Marlene Rau3-6, 1-6
2026-03-13vs WNCE Liddy (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBetty Hollingsworth / Ann McAndrews vs Patricia McClurkin / Kathryn Overstreet6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Connell / Jae Kim vs Jane Miller / Marlene Rau6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Deudne / Janet Janda vs JoAnne Dougher / Sammie Vittoria5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65+ Adult Women 3.0 Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Donna Connell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Ann McAndrews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Betty Hollingsworth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Janet Janda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Jacalyn Dennis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Alexander Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ruby Bright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Deudne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betty Hollingsworth + Ann McAndrews044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna Connell
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Ann McAndrews
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Betty Hollingsworth
6W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Janet Janda
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
Jacalyn Dennis
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.35
Jane Alexander Bell
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ruby Bright
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Deudne
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.