Teams

Empire Tennis

2026 18&Over Women · 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-22vs TCRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmira Moreno / Elizabeth Roth vs Mj Telesca / Meghan Single1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCatherine Parada-davcev vs Mary Sue Dehn6-1, 6-1
2026-07-10vs TCRLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Soanes / Catherine Parada-davcev vs Lynne Brooks / Mj Telesca4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMary Salter vs Helen Li5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Roth / Clarissa McNeill vs Lisa Towers / Meghan Single2-6, 3-6
2026-06-26vs TCRLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Soanes / Catherine Parada-davcev vs Mary Sue Dehn / Lisa Towers6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesClarissa McNeill vs Redia Thomas5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeanna Cockburn / Manasi Ladrigan vs Mj Telesca / Meghan Single2-6, 2-6
2026-06-17vs TCRLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Roth / Karen Soanes vs Lynne Brooks / Redia Thomas1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCatherine Parada-davcev vs Lisa Towers3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesManasi Ladrigan / Amira Moreno vs Mary Sue Dehn / Helen Li3-6, 2-6
2026-06-10vs TCRLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Roth / Manasi Ladrigan vs Helen Li / Mj Telesca0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCatherine Parada-davcev vs Redia Thomas4-6, 1-6
2026-06-05vs TCRLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Soanes / Clarissa McNeill vs Mj Telesca / Lisa Towers1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMary Salter vs Helen Li4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesManasi Ladrigan / Amira Moreno vs Lynne Brooks / Meghan Single3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.27
Catherine Parada-davcev
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.10
Karen Soanes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Clarissa McNeill
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.92
Elizabeth Roth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.91
Amira Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.91
Manasi Ladrigan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Leanna Cockburn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Salter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Catherine Parada-davcev
2W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Karen Soanes
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Clarissa McNeill
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Elizabeth Roth
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
2.5
Amira Moreno
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Manasi Ladrigan
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Leanna Cockburn
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mary Salter
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.