Teams

RAFAEL RC CW5.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 5.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.05 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-10-23vs MARIN CC CW5.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesGita Stiritz / Carrie Cassidy vs Jana Heimann / Despina Mancini3-6, 0-6
2023-10-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGita Stiritz / Rebecca McEfee vs Ingrid Fraunfelder / Nicole Clausen3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Sarah Alba
published
3.24
Ashley Hellyer
published 3.5
3.23
Joanna Brook
published
3.23
Kelsey Grady
published
3.15
Jamie Bartell
published 3.5
3.05
Brooke Perkins
published 3
2.97
Patty Beach
published
2.87
Gita Stiritz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Kathleen Mckeever
published
2.80
Brenda Leerar
published 3
Cat Austin
published 3
Erin Niehaus
published 3
2.74
Karen Staats
published
2.67
Erin Brewer
published 3
2.56
Hannah Rahill
published 3
2.52
Carol Njus
published 3
2.31
Carrie Pallister
published 2.5
2.25
Jill Dayal
published
Jennifer Paletta
published
Lisa Tornello
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Hellyer + Joanna Brook4838% games−1.6% vs expected
Patty Beach + Karen Staats1442% games−1.6% vs expected
Patty Beach + Erin Brewer303 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Bartell + Ashley Hellyer033 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Bartell + Joanna Brook123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Alba
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Ashley Hellyer
20W–31L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Joanna Brook
14W–23L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Kelsey Grady
21W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.23
3.5
Jamie Bartell
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Brooke Perkins
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Patty Beach
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Gita Stiritz
15W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
Kathleen Mckeever
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Brenda Leerar
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Cat Austin
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Erin Niehaus
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Staats
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Erin Brewer
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.67
3
Hannah Rahill
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Carol Njus
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Carrie Pallister
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.31
Jill Dayal
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
Jennifer Paletta
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Tornello
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.