Teams

Rea

2025 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-11-08vs Stellar StrikersWon 30
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Kelsey Forbes6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAshten Rea vs Lisa Marthens6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs Lesli Thompson6-2, 7-6
2025-11-05vs MorelandWon 30
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Sarah Lawrence6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAshten Rea vs Jill Rose7-6, 7-5
W#3 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs Marie Sokoloff6-2, 6-0
2025-11-01Split 11
L#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Jill Rose2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesBari Abensohn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-19vs Stellar StrikersLost 12
L#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Lisa Marthens5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs Kelsey Forbes6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Krista Swetz1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-16vs MorelandWon 20
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Lezlie Moreland6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs Deborah Greenside6-4, 6-2
2025-10-08vs Stellar StrikersWon 10
W#2 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Adrienne Dilaimy6-0, 6-0
2025-10-04vs Stellar StrikersWon 21
L#1 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs Lisa Marthens2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAshten Rea vs Ay Rothany Koballa6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Lesli Thompson6-4, 6-1
2025-09-30vs MorelandWon 10
W#2 SinglesAshten Rea vs Deborah Greenside6-1, 6-3
2025-09-21vs MorelandWon 30
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Jill Rose7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Savannah Bergen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Laura Laabs6-3, 6-0
2025-09-14vs Stellar StrikersWon 20
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Kelsey Forbes5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Lisa Marthens6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Xenia Baranova
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.78
Wenxi Li
published
3.76
Teresa Pedley
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.73
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.65
Ashten Rea
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.52
Bari Abensohn
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chanpen Teeranon + Ashten Rea224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Xenia Baranova
204W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Wenxi Li
28W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Teresa Pedley
33W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Chanpen Teeranon
208W–208L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ashten Rea
143W–116L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Bari Abensohn
95W–87L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.