Teams

SSLT BLACK

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs HG REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSara Percival / Katie Keen vs Amy Silverman / Anne Kocur6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSandy Skibness vs Ann O'Connor6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSheila Marino / Heather Kuzma vs Jill Lloyd / Catharine Miller6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaren Fukuoka / Rachel Austin vs Sheila Salyers / Pamela Spehn1-6, 3-6
2021-07-13vs GAC PINKLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichelle Woolley / Sheila Marino vs Lauren Elmakis / Samantha Schwartz6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKathleen Crockett vs Mary DuBois2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesHeather Kuzma / Sara Percival vs Tracy Sickels / Katherine Flahive6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRachel Austin / Amy Koldyke vs Rhonda Buder / Kay Christensen0-6, 1-6
2021-07-06vs WC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesAmy Koldyke / Kathleen Crockett vs Dana Sandberg / Stacy Masur3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesHeather Kuzma vs Amy Wiedeman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Keen / Sandy Skibness vs CC Dick / Jamie Gagne6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Fukuoka / Michelle Woolley vs SUSAN MORAVEK / Katherine Roth3-6, 5-7
2021-06-29vs HRCA REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesMichelle Woolley / Sandy Skibness vs Carol Avery / Fauna MacKillip6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKatie Keen vs Melissa Wiseman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSheila Marino / Rachel Austin vs Maria Hush / Stephanee Schlachtenhaufen0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Fukuoka / Kathleen Crockett vs Carol Manlove / Lindsay Kamel2-6, 1-6
2021-06-22vs PRC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesHeather Kuzma / Sandy Skibness vs Birgitte Sandgaard / Wendy Gensler6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSheila Marino vs Cindi Turchik6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Woolley / Amy Koldyke vs Susan Kim / Christine Heimbuck6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Fukuoka / Kathleen Crockett vs Karen Matous / Sharie Purchase4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-15vs HW REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Woolley / Heather Kuzma vs Shelly Russell / Nicole Moore6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Fukuoka / Kathleen Crockett vs Sandi Bozanic / Angie Morris2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Keen / Rachel Austin vs Allison Barker / Kristen Welsh6-1, 6-2
2021-06-08vs KNO REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesHeather Kuzma / Katie Keen vs Barb Richards / Jessica Hunt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheila Marino / Sandy Skibness vs Tammy Kinnes / Julie Madden2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRachel Austin / Karen Fukuoka vs MaryLynn Thompson / Candace Sotwick2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Katie Keen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.93
Sara Percival
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Heather Kuzma
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Sheila Marino
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.56
Amy Koldyke
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.39
Kathleen Crockett
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.15
Karen Fukuoka
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Michelle Woolley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Rachel Austin
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Sandy Skibness
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Percival + Heather Kuzma9164% games+6.8% vs expected
Amy Koldyke + Heather Kuzma6257% games+6.7% vs expected
Sara Percival + Amy Koldyke4554% games+6.3% vs expected
Sara Percival + Rachel Austin2347% games+4.0% vs expected
Rachel Austin + Karen Fukuoka5451% games+3.7% vs expected
Sheila Marino + Heather Kuzma10654% games+1.2% vs expected
Sheila Marino + Amy Koldyke4744% games−2.4% vs expected
Sara Percival + Sheila Marino9556% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Katie Keen
44W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.00
3
Sara Percival
73W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Heather Kuzma
51W–16L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Sheila Marino
55W–56L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Amy Koldyke
63W–64L career · 3 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
2.56
Kathleen Crockett
22W–28L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%79%21%
2.39
Karen Fukuoka
38W–38L career · 6 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Michelle Woolley
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rachel Austin
32W–35L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandy Skibness
13W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.