Teams

COAC-LIONS

2025 SCTA Doubles League - Santa Barbara · SB - Men Doubles - 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-14vs SB LLW-Colts-Joe LazaarWon 10
W#2 DoublesHon Wai Chan / Matthew Willis vs Joe Lazaer / Wade McBride6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-12-07vs SB LLW-Colts-Joe LazaarLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarc Takemiya / Mark Casady vs Mark Sczbecki / Gary Clark3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJason Marden / Brian Tisdale vs Daniel Thompson / Michael Hicks4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-23vs Elings-String TheoryLost 01
L#1 DoublesIan Sullivan / Jason Marden vs Josh Haber / Joseph Sriprajittichai1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-11-09vs SB LLW-Colts-Joe LazaarSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Casady / John Lamoutte vs Daniel Thompson / Mark Sczbecki1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Willis / Hon Wai Chan vs Gabriel Alcantara / Mark Minnoch7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-02vs Elings-String TheoryWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Casady / Hon Wai Chan vs Joseph Sriprajittichai / Sergey Slyutov4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-19vs SB LLW-Colts-Joe LazaarWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Casady / Jason Marden vs Sergio Orozco / Jaime Garibay6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-12vs Elings-String TheoryWon 10
W#2 DoublesHon Wai Chan / Mark Casady vs LUKE NORONHA / Vikram Oberoi6-3, 6-4
2025-09-21vs Elings-String TheoryLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Lamoutte / Brian Tisdale vs Joseph Sriprajittichai / Sergey Slyutov2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Men Doubles - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Jason Marden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Mark Casady
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.80
Ian Sullivan
published
3.75
Peter Summers
published
3.73
Dana Allin
published 4
3.71
John Lamoutte
published
3.69
Brian Tisdale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Albert Oaten
published 4
3.58
Hon Wai Chan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Matthew Willis
published
3.55
Melvin DeSilva
published
3.53
Marc Takemiya
published
3.47
Joseph Fabbre
published
3.44
George Flores
published
Max Dekle
published
Steve Jolley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Tisdale + Hon Wai Chan10854% gamesnot enough data
Mark Casady + John Lamoutte5259% gamesnot enough data
Melvin DeSilva + Albert Oaten1441% gamesnot enough data
Brian Tisdale + Jason Marden123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Tisdale + Mark Casady303 matchesnot enough data
Hon Wai Chan + Peter Summers033 matchesnot enough data
Jason Marden + Mark Casady303 matchesnot enough data
Jason Marden + Marc Takemiya213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Marden
63W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Mark Casady
51W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Ian Sullivan
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Peter Summers
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Dana Allin
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
John Lamoutte
18W–20L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Brian Tisdale
37W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Albert Oaten
13W–33L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Hon Wai Chan
34W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Matthew Willis
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Melvin DeSilva
12W–48L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Marc Takemiya
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Joseph Fabbre
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
George Flores
17W–30L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.44
Max Dekle
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Jolley
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.