← Teams

SLBBoucher-Smith/Jetton

2022 Lake 18 & Over Summer Singles · Women 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-01vs SLKBienstock/LNTC 3.5Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesBuket Boucher vs Robin Underwood6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesOlesia Kososki vs Kristine Bienstock6-3, 6-4
2022-07-26vs SLKChilders/TrumpSplit 1–1
W#1 SinglesBuket Boucher vs MaryGwen Murash6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesOlesia Kososki vs Keri Norcross6-7, 4-6
2022-07-18Split 1–1
L#2 SinglesJessica Benningfield vs Jennifer Ross5-7, 5-7
W#3 SinglesBuket Boucher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-11vs SLKBienstock/LNTC 3.5Split 1–1
L#2 SinglesOlesia Kososki vs Kristine Bienstock6-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesKaren Haigney vs Cyndi Johnson6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-08vs SLKChilders/TrumpLost 0–1
L#1 SinglesBrooke Hondros vs Keri Norcross2-6, 2-6
2022-06-29vs SLKAtkins/PenSplit 1–1
W#2 SinglesJessica Benningfield vs KC Bywater6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKaren Haigney vs Jennifer Ross2-6, 1-6
2022-06-20vs SLKBienstock/LNTC 3.5Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesJessica Benningfield vs Sarah Norton6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLlnon North vs Cyndi Johnson6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesOlesia Kososki vs Anna Bonham6-4, 6-4
2022-06-16vs SLKChilders/TrumpLost 0–1
L#1 SinglesLlnon North vs MaryGwen Murash2-6, 2-6
2022-06-06vs SLKAtkins/PenWon 2–1
W#1 SinglesJessica Benningfield vs Jenny Yaudes6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKaren Haigney vs Mary Kay Portaro3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesBrooke Hondros vs Megan Brown7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Jessica Benningfield
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.46
Buket Boucher
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.43
Suzy Cedrone
published 3.5
3.32
Olesia Kososki
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Karen Haigney
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Brooke Hondros
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Llnon North
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Buket Boucher + Llnon North5–262% gamesnot enough data
Buket Boucher + Jessica Benningfield2–13 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jessica Benningfield
100W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Buket Boucher
122W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.46
3.5
Suzy Cedrone
49W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Olesia Kososki
33W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Karen Haigney
66W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Brooke Hondros
95W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Llnon North
72W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.